<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calm Down Folks, No Possibility of Blackberry Shutdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/comment-page-1/#comment-17680</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/001146/#comment-17680</guid>
		<description>You idiot NTP doesn&#039;t have NO technology it&#039;s just a patent company. Do your research you moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You idiot NTP doesn&#8217;t have NO technology it&#8217;s just a patent company. Do your research you moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/comment-page-1/#comment-481839</link>
		<dc:creator>douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 20:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/001146/#comment-481839</guid>
		<description>You idiot NTP doesn&#039;t have NO technology it&#039;s just a patent company. Do your research you moron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You idiot NTP doesn&#8217;t have NO technology it&#8217;s just a patent company. Do your research you moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/comment-page-1/#comment-13229</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/001146/#comment-13229</guid>
		<description>Good points except for the fact that NTP has invested money into Good Technology, so in a way, they DO have a competing product.  However, I do completely agree that a shutdown won&#039;t happen.  I think the judge will impose the injunction and give RIM 90 days to implement it.  During those 90 days, he will not allow RIM to sell in the US, but will keep the network up.  During those 90 days, RIM and NTP will settle.

The &#039;workaround&#039; is another animal entirely.  The fact that the workaround is bound to involve some kind of architecture changes, will it invalidate the FIPS certification for government use?  I would doubt that RIM would take that chance, but what affect implementing the work around would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points except for the fact that NTP has invested money into Good Technology, so in a way, they DO have a competing product.  However, I do completely agree that a shutdown won&#8217;t happen.  I think the judge will impose the injunction and give RIM 90 days to implement it.  During those 90 days, he will not allow RIM to sell in the US, but will keep the network up.  During those 90 days, RIM and NTP will settle.</p>
<p>The &#8216;workaround&#8217; is another animal entirely.  The fact that the workaround is bound to involve some kind of architecture changes, will it invalidate the FIPS certification for government use?  I would doubt that RIM would take that chance, but what affect implementing the work around would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/comment-page-1/#comment-481837</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/001146/#comment-481837</guid>
		<description>Good points except for the fact that NTP has invested money into Good Technology, so in a way, they DO have a competing product.  However, I do completely agree that a shutdown won&#039;t happen.  I think the judge will impose the injunction and give RIM 90 days to implement it.  During those 90 days, he will not allow RIM to sell in the US, but will keep the network up.  During those 90 days, RIM and NTP will settle.

The &#039;workaround&#039; is another animal entirely.  The fact that the workaround is bound to involve some kind of architecture changes, will it invalidate the FIPS certification for government use?  I would doubt that RIM would take that chance, but what affect implementing the work around would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points except for the fact that NTP has invested money into Good Technology, so in a way, they DO have a competing product.  However, I do completely agree that a shutdown won&#8217;t happen.  I think the judge will impose the injunction and give RIM 90 days to implement it.  During those 90 days, he will not allow RIM to sell in the US, but will keep the network up.  During those 90 days, RIM and NTP will settle.</p>
<p>The &#8216;workaround&#8217; is another animal entirely.  The fact that the workaround is bound to involve some kind of architecture changes, will it invalidate the FIPS certification for government use?  I would doubt that RIM would take that chance, but what affect implementing the work around would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GG</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/comment-page-1/#comment-481838</link>
		<dc:creator>GG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/001146/#comment-481838</guid>
		<description>Good points except for the fact that NTP has invested money into Good Technology, so in a way, they DO have a competing product.  However, I do completely agree that a shutdown won&#039;t happen.  I think the judge will impose the injunction and give RIM 90 days to implement it.  During those 90 days, he will not allow RIM to sell in the US, but will keep the network up.  During those 90 days, RIM and NTP will settle.

The &#039;workaround&#039; is another animal entirely.  The fact that the workaround is bound to involve some kind of architecture changes, will it invalidate the FIPS certification for government use?  I would doubt that RIM would take that chance, but what affect implementing the work around would have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points except for the fact that NTP has invested money into Good Technology, so in a way, they DO have a competing product.  However, I do completely agree that a shutdown won&#8217;t happen.  I think the judge will impose the injunction and give RIM 90 days to implement it.  During those 90 days, he will not allow RIM to sell in the US, but will keep the network up.  During those 90 days, RIM and NTP will settle.</p>
<p>The &#8216;workaround&#8217; is another animal entirely.  The fact that the workaround is bound to involve some kind of architecture changes, will it invalidate the FIPS certification for government use?  I would doubt that RIM would take that chance, but what affect implementing the work around would have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Curtner</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/comment-page-1/#comment-13222</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Curtner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/001146/#comment-13222</guid>
		<description>I entirely agree with your position on this topic, and I like your perspective.

In my opinion, the reason why this bad press is spinning out of control is because RIM hasn&#039;t fully addressed these 3 questions:

1.  Some people don&#039;t believe RIM has a technical work-around (because no details have been released).

2.  People are unclear as to when an injunction could be actually be implemented, so they are acting like it&#039;s going to be next week.

3. People are unclear as to exactly what RIM operations might be shut down if an injunction is implemented. (i.e. Would SMS still work?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I entirely agree with your position on this topic, and I like your perspective.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the reason why this bad press is spinning out of control is because RIM hasn&#8217;t fully addressed these 3 questions:</p>
<p>1.  Some people don&#8217;t believe RIM has a technical work-around (because no details have been released).</p>
<p>2.  People are unclear as to when an injunction could be actually be implemented, so they are acting like it&#8217;s going to be next week.</p>
<p>3. People are unclear as to exactly what RIM operations might be shut down if an injunction is implemented. (i.e. Would SMS still work?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Curtner</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/comment-page-1/#comment-481836</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Curtner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/001146/#comment-481836</guid>
		<description>I entirely agree with your position on this topic, and I like your perspective.

In my opinion, the reason why this bad press is spinning out of control is because RIM hasn&#039;t fully addressed these 3 questions:

1.  Some people don&#039;t believe RIM has a technical work-around (because no details have been released).

2.  People are unclear as to when an injunction could be actually be implemented, so they are acting like it&#039;s going to be next week.

3. People are unclear as to exactly what RIM operations might be shut down if an injunction is implemented. (i.e. Would SMS still work?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I entirely agree with your position on this topic, and I like your perspective.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the reason why this bad press is spinning out of control is because RIM hasn&#8217;t fully addressed these 3 questions:</p>
<p>1.  Some people don&#8217;t believe RIM has a technical work-around (because no details have been released).</p>
<p>2.  People are unclear as to when an injunction could be actually be implemented, so they are acting like it&#8217;s going to be next week.</p>
<p>3. People are unclear as to exactly what RIM operations might be shut down if an injunction is implemented. (i.e. Would SMS still work?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blackberrycool.com/2005/12/01/calm-down-folks-no-possibility-of-blackberry-shutdown/feed/ ) in 0.41924 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 3:30 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 4:30 pm UTC -->
