<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackberry Connect, Success or Doomed to Fail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/blackberry-connect-success-or-doomed-to-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/blackberry-connect-success-or-doomed-to-fail/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 19:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/blackberry-connect-success-or-doomed-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-19396</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/001585/#comment-19396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One point I think you fail to mention is that the lawsuit with NTP and RIM could be reason why Blackberry Connect was so slow to being adopted. There was major issues with it and the hardware companies didn&#039;t want to get sued themselves! Blackberry Connect first came out in 2004, which would of gave RIM 2-3 years to promote their technology before any real threat came along, see Microsoft.

If Blackberry Connect fails, you can totally blame it on RIM not settling with NTP sooner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One point I think you fail to mention is that the lawsuit with NTP and RIM could be reason why Blackberry Connect was so slow to being adopted. There was major issues with it and the hardware companies didn&#8217;t want to get sued themselves! Blackberry Connect first came out in 2004, which would of gave RIM 2-3 years to promote their technology before any real threat came along, see Microsoft.</p>
<p>If Blackberry Connect fails, you can totally blame it on RIM not settling with NTP sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/blackberry-connect-success-or-doomed-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-482656</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/001585/#comment-482656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One point I think you fail to mention is that the lawsuit with NTP and RIM could be reason why Blackberry Connect was so slow to being adopted. There was major issues with it and the hardware companies didn&#039;t want to get sued themselves! Blackberry Connect first came out in 2004, which would of gave RIM 2-3 years to promote their technology before any real threat came along, see Microsoft.

If Blackberry Connect fails, you can totally blame it on RIM not settling with NTP sooner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One point I think you fail to mention is that the lawsuit with NTP and RIM could be reason why Blackberry Connect was so slow to being adopted. There was major issues with it and the hardware companies didn&#8217;t want to get sued themselves! Blackberry Connect first came out in 2004, which would of gave RIM 2-3 years to promote their technology before any real threat came along, see Microsoft.</p>
<p>If Blackberry Connect fails, you can totally blame it on RIM not settling with NTP sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/blackberry-connect-success-or-doomed-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-19395</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/001585/#comment-19395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the problems with the Connect licensing is that there is no provision requiring licensees to support RIM&#039;s IT Policies.  They are free to support or not support which ever items they choose.  This is a big issue for Enterprise IT shops where mandatory IT Policies are one of the major reasons RIM is the market leader in this field]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the problems with the Connect licensing is that there is no provision requiring licensees to support RIM&#8217;s IT Policies.  They are free to support or not support which ever items they choose.  This is a big issue for Enterprise IT shops where mandatory IT Policies are one of the major reasons RIM is the market leader in this field</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/blackberry-connect-success-or-doomed-to-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-482655</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/04/04/001585/#comment-482655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the problems with the Connect licensing is that there is no provision requiring licensees to support RIM&#039;s IT Policies.  They are free to support or not support which ever items they choose.  This is a big issue for Enterprise IT shops where mandatory IT Policies are one of the major reasons RIM is the market leader in this field]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the problems with the Connect licensing is that there is no provision requiring licensees to support RIM&#8217;s IT Policies.  They are free to support or not support which ever items they choose.  This is a big issue for Enterprise IT shops where mandatory IT Policies are one of the major reasons RIM is the market leader in this field</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
