<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RIM and Apple to release AppleBerry?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/rim-and-apple-to-release-appleberry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/rim-and-apple-to-release-appleberry/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool &#187; Net says No to iBerry</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/rim-and-apple-to-release-appleberry/comment-page-1/#comment-30566</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool &#187; Net says No to iBerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/001837/#comment-30566</guid>
		<description>[...] With rumours of the iBerry dropping earlier this week, the Internet has obviously wasted no time in offering its opinion on whether or not the supposed joint effort between RIM and Apple is possible. While no one is denying how desireable such a device would be, the majority of bloggers are refusing to get excited over what they consider pure speculation. Here&#8217;s a compilation of the highlights. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With rumours of the iBerry dropping earlier this week, the Internet has obviously wasted no time in offering its opinion on whether or not the supposed joint effort between RIM and Apple is possible. While no one is denying how desireable such a device would be, the majority of bloggers are refusing to get excited over what they consider pure speculation. Here&#8217;s a compilation of the highlights. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KENROY</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/rim-and-apple-to-release-appleberry/comment-page-1/#comment-30311</link>
		<dc:creator>KENROY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/001837/#comment-30311</guid>
		<description>Just a quick question in regards to the iberry.  I now have the 8700, will I have to change my BB to enjoy the itune feature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick question in regards to the iberry.  I now have the 8700, will I have to change my BB to enjoy the itune feature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KENROY</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/rim-and-apple-to-release-appleberry/comment-page-1/#comment-482955</link>
		<dc:creator>KENROY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/001837/#comment-482955</guid>
		<description>Just a quick question in regards to the iberry.  I now have the 8700, will I have to change my BB to enjoy the itune feature?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick question in regards to the iberry.  I now have the 8700, will I have to change my BB to enjoy the itune feature?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blackberrycool.com/2006/06/05/rim-and-apple-to-release-appleberry/feed/ ) in 0.42974 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 11:06 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 12:06 pm UTC -->
