<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treo 700p at top of the charts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trio 700p &#124; Ballocapesso</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-522539</link>
		<dc:creator>Trio 700p &#124; Ballocapesso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 10:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-522539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Treo 700p at top of the charts &#124; BlackBerry CoolJul 26, 2006 &#8230; Performance: 97 (superior) Features: 62 (fair) Design: 80 (Very good). The main complaint: No camera. The Trio 700p got an 81 rating (perf: 60, &#8230; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Treo 700p at top of the charts | BlackBerry CoolJul 26, 2006 &#8230; Performance: 97 (superior) Features: 62 (fair) Design: 80 (Very good). The main complaint: No camera. The Trio 700p got an 81 rating (perf: 60, &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-39458</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-39458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just got an mda after a couple years of suffering with the 7100t.  my god, they don&#039;t compare.  i think RIM needs to get their heads out of their butts when it comes to consumer needs.  even your daughter&#039;s sidekick send email faster than a 7100t with a wait icon kicking in every 5 seconds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just got an mda after a couple years of suffering with the 7100t.  my god, they don&#8217;t compare.  i think RIM needs to get their heads out of their butts when it comes to consumer needs.  even your daughter&#8217;s sidekick send email faster than a 7100t with a wait icon kicking in every 5 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-483182</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-483182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[just got an mda after a couple years of suffering with the 7100t.  my god, they don&#039;t compare.  i think RIM needs to get their heads out of their butts when it comes to consumer needs.  even your daughter&#039;s sidekick send email faster than a 7100t with a wait icon kicking in every 5 seconds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just got an mda after a couple years of suffering with the 7100t.  my god, they don&#8217;t compare.  i think RIM needs to get their heads out of their butts when it comes to consumer needs.  even your daughter&#8217;s sidekick send email faster than a 7100t with a wait icon kicking in every 5 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-38741</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-38741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 8700g got a 76 rating.  Which is a composite of three values:

Performance:  97 (superior)
Features:  62 (fair)
Design: 80 (Very good)

The main complaint:  No camera.  

The Trio 700p got an 81 rating (perf: 60, feat: 71, design: 91).  The Q got a 78 (65, 88, 71).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8700g got a 76 rating.  Which is a composite of three values:</p>
<p>Performance:  97 (superior)<br />
Features:  62 (fair)<br />
Design: 80 (Very good)</p>
<p>The main complaint:  No camera.  </p>
<p>The Trio 700p got an 81 rating (perf: 60, feat: 71, design: 91).  The Q got a 78 (65, 88, 71).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-483181</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-483181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 8700g got a 76 rating.  Which is a composite of three values:

Performance:  97 (superior)
Features:  62 (fair)
Design: 80 (Very good)

The main complaint:  No camera.  

The Trio 700p got an 81 rating (perf: 60, feat: 71, design: 91).  The Q got a 78 (65, 88, 71).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8700g got a 76 rating.  Which is a composite of three values:</p>
<p>Performance:  97 (superior)<br />
Features:  62 (fair)<br />
Design: 80 (Very good)</p>
<p>The main complaint:  No camera.  </p>
<p>The Trio 700p got an 81 rating (perf: 60, feat: 71, design: 91).  The Q got a 78 (65, 88, 71).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris sivori</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-38740</link>
		<dc:creator>chris sivori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-38740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The motorola q is junk. Haven&#039;t used the others. I love my 8700.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The motorola q is junk. Haven&#8217;t used the others. I love my 8700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris sivori</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-483180</link>
		<dc:creator>chris sivori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-483180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The motorola q is junk. Haven&#039;t used the others. I love my 8700.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The motorola q is junk. Haven&#8217;t used the others. I love my 8700.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moog</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-38739</link>
		<dc:creator>moog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-38739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Where was BlackBerry on the chart? Well, actually, it didnâ€™t make it...&quot;

How is this even remotely possible?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Where was BlackBerry on the chart? Well, actually, it didnâ€™t make it&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>How is this even remotely possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moog</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/treo-700p-at-top-of-the-charts/comment-page-1/#comment-483179</link>
		<dc:creator>moog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/07/26/002059/#comment-483179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Where was BlackBerry on the chart? Well, actually, it didnâ€™t make it...&quot;

How is this even remotely possible?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Where was BlackBerry on the chart? Well, actually, it didnâ€™t make it&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>How is this even remotely possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
