<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ThoughtPiece: How Successful Will The Pearl Be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool &#187; ThoughtPiece: How successful will the Pearl be?</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/comment-page-1/#comment-46333</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool &#187; ThoughtPiece: How successful will the Pearl be?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 12:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/002245/#comment-46333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/comment-page-1/#comment-45190</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/002245/#comment-45190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George and dp: thanks for your thoughtful comments.  

dp: certainly, as it stands now, cameras in cell phones don&#039;t come close in quality to those of stand alone digital cameras.  However, personally I do find it convenient to have a camera in a cell phone at times.  Why? Because I don&#039;t always carry around my nice Sony digicam (good to see another Sony fan here!).  So sometimes the best camera is the one you actually have on you at the time.  Also, it is nice to be able to snap a picture and by virtue of it being in your cell phone, be able to send it to someone else immediately, without having to wait to get home and load the picture in your PC.

It&#039;s interesting that far more pictures are taken with cell phone cameras than with stand alone digicams.  That speaks to the convenience factor.

The same goes with music. The iPod is great, but sometimes it&#039;s more convenient to have a few songs in your cell phone than to carry a separate device.  And let&#039;s not forget that if you have a 1G memory card, for instance, you have as much storage as an iPod nano, which amount to about 250 songs.  That&#039;s plenty for a lot of people in most situations.

Also, with regards to the Pearl, regardless of these extra features, what is so striking is the size.  Just to have a smartphone with BB email in that size is a huge advantage, IMHO.  The size alone might justify its purchase by many, many people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George and dp: thanks for your thoughtful comments.  </p>
<p>dp: certainly, as it stands now, cameras in cell phones don&#8217;t come close in quality to those of stand alone digital cameras.  However, personally I do find it convenient to have a camera in a cell phone at times.  Why? Because I don&#8217;t always carry around my nice Sony digicam (good to see another Sony fan here!).  So sometimes the best camera is the one you actually have on you at the time.  Also, it is nice to be able to snap a picture and by virtue of it being in your cell phone, be able to send it to someone else immediately, without having to wait to get home and load the picture in your PC.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that far more pictures are taken with cell phone cameras than with stand alone digicams.  That speaks to the convenience factor.</p>
<p>The same goes with music. The iPod is great, but sometimes it&#8217;s more convenient to have a few songs in your cell phone than to carry a separate device.  And let&#8217;s not forget that if you have a 1G memory card, for instance, you have as much storage as an iPod nano, which amount to about 250 songs.  That&#8217;s plenty for a lot of people in most situations.</p>
<p>Also, with regards to the Pearl, regardless of these extra features, what is so striking is the size.  Just to have a smartphone with BB email in that size is a huge advantage, IMHO.  The size alone might justify its purchase by many, many people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/comment-page-1/#comment-483439</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/002245/#comment-483439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George and dp: thanks for your thoughtful comments.  

dp: certainly, as it stands now, cameras in cell phones don&#039;t come close in quality to those of stand alone digital cameras.  However, personally I do find it convenient to have a camera in a cell phone at times.  Why? Because I don&#039;t always carry around my nice Sony digicam (good to see another Sony fan here!).  So sometimes the best camera is the one you actually have on you at the time.  Also, it is nice to be able to snap a picture and by virtue of it being in your cell phone, be able to send it to someone else immediately, without having to wait to get home and load the picture in your PC.

It&#039;s interesting that far more pictures are taken with cell phone cameras than with stand alone digicams.  That speaks to the convenience factor.

The same goes with music. The iPod is great, but sometimes it&#039;s more convenient to have a few songs in your cell phone than to carry a separate device.  And let&#039;s not forget that if you have a 1G memory card, for instance, you have as much storage as an iPod nano, which amount to about 250 songs.  That&#039;s plenty for a lot of people in most situations.

Also, with regards to the Pearl, regardless of these extra features, what is so striking is the size.  Just to have a smartphone with BB email in that size is a huge advantage, IMHO.  The size alone might justify its purchase by many, many people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George and dp: thanks for your thoughtful comments.  </p>
<p>dp: certainly, as it stands now, cameras in cell phones don&#8217;t come close in quality to those of stand alone digital cameras.  However, personally I do find it convenient to have a camera in a cell phone at times.  Why? Because I don&#8217;t always carry around my nice Sony digicam (good to see another Sony fan here!).  So sometimes the best camera is the one you actually have on you at the time.  Also, it is nice to be able to snap a picture and by virtue of it being in your cell phone, be able to send it to someone else immediately, without having to wait to get home and load the picture in your PC.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that far more pictures are taken with cell phone cameras than with stand alone digicams.  That speaks to the convenience factor.</p>
<p>The same goes with music. The iPod is great, but sometimes it&#8217;s more convenient to have a few songs in your cell phone than to carry a separate device.  And let&#8217;s not forget that if you have a 1G memory card, for instance, you have as much storage as an iPod nano, which amount to about 250 songs.  That&#8217;s plenty for a lot of people in most situations.</p>
<p>Also, with regards to the Pearl, regardless of these extra features, what is so striking is the size.  Just to have a smartphone with BB email in that size is a huge advantage, IMHO.  The size alone might justify its purchase by many, many people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thought</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/comment-page-1/#comment-483440</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/002245/#comment-483440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George and dp: thanks for your thoughtful comments.  

dp: certainly, as it stands now, cameras in cell phones don&#039;t come close in quality to those of stand alone digital cameras.  However, personally I do find it convenient to have a camera in a cell phone at times.  Why? Because I don&#039;t always carry around my nice Sony digicam (good to see another Sony fan here!).  So sometimes the best camera is the one you actually have on you at the time.  Also, it is nice to be able to snap a picture and by virtue of it being in your cell phone, be able to send it to someone else immediately, without having to wait to get home and load the picture in your PC.

It&#039;s interesting that far more pictures are taken with cell phone cameras than with stand alone digicams.  That speaks to the convenience factor.

The same goes with music. The iPod is great, but sometimes it&#039;s more convenient to have a few songs in your cell phone than to carry a separate device.  And let&#039;s not forget that if you have a 1G memory card, for instance, you have as much storage as an iPod nano, which amount to about 250 songs.  That&#039;s plenty for a lot of people in most situations.

Also, with regards to the Pearl, regardless of these extra features, what is so striking is the size.  Just to have a smartphone with BB email in that size is a huge advantage, IMHO.  The size alone might justify its purchase by many, many people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George and dp: thanks for your thoughtful comments.  </p>
<p>dp: certainly, as it stands now, cameras in cell phones don&#8217;t come close in quality to those of stand alone digital cameras.  However, personally I do find it convenient to have a camera in a cell phone at times.  Why? Because I don&#8217;t always carry around my nice Sony digicam (good to see another Sony fan here!).  So sometimes the best camera is the one you actually have on you at the time.  Also, it is nice to be able to snap a picture and by virtue of it being in your cell phone, be able to send it to someone else immediately, without having to wait to get home and load the picture in your PC.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting that far more pictures are taken with cell phone cameras than with stand alone digicams.  That speaks to the convenience factor.</p>
<p>The same goes with music. The iPod is great, but sometimes it&#8217;s more convenient to have a few songs in your cell phone than to carry a separate device.  And let&#8217;s not forget that if you have a 1G memory card, for instance, you have as much storage as an iPod nano, which amount to about 250 songs.  That&#8217;s plenty for a lot of people in most situations.</p>
<p>Also, with regards to the Pearl, regardless of these extra features, what is so striking is the size.  Just to have a smartphone with BB email in that size is a huge advantage, IMHO.  The size alone might justify its purchase by many, many people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dp</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/comment-page-1/#comment-45157</link>
		<dc:creator>dp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/002245/#comment-45157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure why I need this device. If I want a REAL camera I use a sony 7.2 Meg T10...real pictures, not play pictures. For Video/Audio playback I use a 60GB Ipod..for the amount of content one starts to have phone&#039;s/pda&#039;s don&#039;t cut it.

If one wants a combined phone/pda/sync&#039;d cal/email and  a real &quot;usualble&quot; keyboard then the 8700 is the right answer now in the mkt....never understood the value of music/audio/pictures in the same device.

5 years from now, if I can get a phone/pda device that also has the same resolution mega-pixel wise with the latest/greatest digital camera&#039;s and the same storage capacity as an ipod video/mp3 player then I would buy the device in a second. The pearl, just like other pda/phones in the mktplace is wanting on storage and camera mega-pixel levels....maybe someday they will get there...but not now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why I need this device. If I want a REAL camera I use a sony 7.2 Meg T10&#8230;real pictures, not play pictures. For Video/Audio playback I use a 60GB Ipod..for the amount of content one starts to have phone&#8217;s/pda&#8217;s don&#8217;t cut it.</p>
<p>If one wants a combined phone/pda/sync&#8217;d cal/email and  a real &#8220;usualble&#8221; keyboard then the 8700 is the right answer now in the mkt&#8230;.never understood the value of music/audio/pictures in the same device.</p>
<p>5 years from now, if I can get a phone/pda device that also has the same resolution mega-pixel wise with the latest/greatest digital camera&#8217;s and the same storage capacity as an ipod video/mp3 player then I would buy the device in a second. The pearl, just like other pda/phones in the mktplace is wanting on storage and camera mega-pixel levels&#8230;.maybe someday they will get there&#8230;but not now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dp</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/comment-page-1/#comment-483438</link>
		<dc:creator>dp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 08:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/002245/#comment-483438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure why I need this device. If I want a REAL camera I use a sony 7.2 Meg T10...real pictures, not play pictures. For Video/Audio playback I use a 60GB Ipod..for the amount of content one starts to have phone&#039;s/pda&#039;s don&#039;t cut it.

If one wants a combined phone/pda/sync&#039;d cal/email and  a real &quot;usualble&quot; keyboard then the 8700 is the right answer now in the mkt....never understood the value of music/audio/pictures in the same device.

5 years from now, if I can get a phone/pda device that also has the same resolution mega-pixel wise with the latest/greatest digital camera&#039;s and the same storage capacity as an ipod video/mp3 player then I would buy the device in a second. The pearl, just like other pda/phones in the mktplace is wanting on storage and camera mega-pixel levels....maybe someday they will get there...but not now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why I need this device. If I want a REAL camera I use a sony 7.2 Meg T10&#8230;real pictures, not play pictures. For Video/Audio playback I use a 60GB Ipod..for the amount of content one starts to have phone&#8217;s/pda&#8217;s don&#8217;t cut it.</p>
<p>If one wants a combined phone/pda/sync&#8217;d cal/email and  a real &#8220;usualble&#8221; keyboard then the 8700 is the right answer now in the mkt&#8230;.never understood the value of music/audio/pictures in the same device.</p>
<p>5 years from now, if I can get a phone/pda device that also has the same resolution mega-pixel wise with the latest/greatest digital camera&#8217;s and the same storage capacity as an ipod video/mp3 player then I would buy the device in a second. The pearl, just like other pda/phones in the mktplace is wanting on storage and camera mega-pixel levels&#8230;.maybe someday they will get there&#8230;but not now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Burnett</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/comment-page-1/#comment-45110</link>
		<dc:creator>George Burnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/002245/#comment-45110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am in complete agreement with you on the marketability of the BB Pearl! This device at first glance is a Sidekick competitor... a toy that isn&#039;t to be taken serious amongst the BB Fanboys of the world. Yet a second glance at this device uncovers a certain &quot;glamour / business&quot; appeal. &quot;RAZR vs. 7130e&quot;

Once the younger generations pic up on the functionality of todays BB devices and mix it with celebrity icons &amp; RAZRish style   this device could be a real hit!

As a late 20&#039;s 8700c user I am seriously considering purchasing a BB Pearl myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in complete agreement with you on the marketability of the BB Pearl! This device at first glance is a Sidekick competitor&#8230; a toy that isn&#8217;t to be taken serious amongst the BB Fanboys of the world. Yet a second glance at this device uncovers a certain &#8220;glamour / business&#8221; appeal. &#8220;RAZR vs. 7130e&#8221;</p>
<p>Once the younger generations pic up on the functionality of todays BB devices and mix it with celebrity icons &amp; RAZRish style   this device could be a real hit!</p>
<p>As a late 20&#8242;s 8700c user I am seriously considering purchasing a BB Pearl myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Burnett</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/thoughtpiece-how-successful-will-the-pearl-be/comment-page-1/#comment-483437</link>
		<dc:creator>George Burnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/06/002245/#comment-483437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am in complete agreement with you on the marketability of the BB Pearl! This device at first glance is a Sidekick competitor... a toy that isn&#039;t to be taken serious amongst the BB Fanboys of the world. Yet a second glance at this device uncovers a certain &quot;glamour / business&quot; appeal. &quot;RAZR vs. 7130e&quot;

Once the younger generations pic up on the functionality of todays BB devices and mix it with celebrity icons &amp; RAZRish style   this device could be a real hit!

As a late 20&#039;s 8700c user I am seriously considering purchasing a BB Pearl myself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in complete agreement with you on the marketability of the BB Pearl! This device at first glance is a Sidekick competitor&#8230; a toy that isn&#8217;t to be taken serious amongst the BB Fanboys of the world. Yet a second glance at this device uncovers a certain &#8220;glamour / business&#8221; appeal. &#8220;RAZR vs. 7130e&#8221;</p>
<p>Once the younger generations pic up on the functionality of todays BB devices and mix it with celebrity icons &amp; RAZRish style   this device could be a real hit!</p>
<p>As a late 20&#8242;s 8700c user I am seriously considering purchasing a BB Pearl myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
