<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ThoughtPiece: Why the BlackBerry 8800 Has No Camera (Yet)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dj_GabbaB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-444668</link>
		<dc:creator>Dj_GabbaB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-444668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This  100% favorited]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This  100% favorited</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dj_GabbaB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-483602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dj_GabbaB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-483602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This  100% favorited]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This  100% favorited</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackberry, a história completa. (Em inglês) &#124; Manoel Franklin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-274207</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackberry, a história completa. (Em inglês) &#124; Manoel Franklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-274207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Even though the 87- and 8800 series contained more consumer-friendly features, they were still a bit lacking in that department. Specifically, a camera was and had been missing from BlackBerrys from the get-go. It’s been said that RIM opted not to include cameras because a number of professions disallow them (say, in a courtroom), or some bosses don’t want them on their employees’ phones. Of course, these claims have been challenged, with people arguing that this was RIM intentionally holding back features. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even though the 87- and 8800 series contained more consumer-friendly features, they were still a bit lacking in that department. Specifically, a camera was and had been missing from BlackBerrys from the get-go. It’s been said that RIM opted not to include cameras because a number of professions disallow them (say, in a courtroom), or some bosses don’t want them on their employees’ phones. Of course, these claims have been challenged, with people arguing that this was RIM intentionally holding back features. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The history of the BlackBerry &#124; BB Geeks</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-273637</link>
		<dc:creator>The history of the BlackBerry &#124; BB Geeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-273637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Even though the 87- and 8800 series contained more consumer-friendly features, they were still a bit lacking in that department. Specifically, a camera was and had been missing from BlackBerrys from the get-go. It&#8217;s been said that RIM opted not to include cameras because a number of professions disallow them (say, in a courtroom), or some bosses don&#8217;t want them on their employees&#8217; phones. Of course, these claims have been challenged, with people arguing that this was RIM intentionally holding back features. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Even though the 87- and 8800 series contained more consumer-friendly features, they were still a bit lacking in that department. Specifically, a camera was and had been missing from BlackBerrys from the get-go. It&#8217;s been said that RIM opted not to include cameras because a number of professions disallow them (say, in a courtroom), or some bosses don&#8217;t want them on their employees&#8217; phones. Of course, these claims have been challenged, with people arguing that this was RIM intentionally holding back features. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-51282</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-51282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally work in a secure environment and there&#039;s no option of just turning off a camera feature. It&#039;s either there or it isn&#039;t. I&#039;ve been going crazy trying to find phones with the required feature, yet not having a camera. They&#039;re so cheap to add and so many people go crazy over having a camera built in that&#039;s it&#039;s almost a no-brainer, but you would be cutting out most of the government, defense contractors, and other secure facility workers. Personally, I prefer without. I plan on being a long time BB supporter because of the cameraless option. Now I say option, because I thought I read another phone to be released shortly after with the camera feature available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally work in a secure environment and there&#8217;s no option of just turning off a camera feature. It&#8217;s either there or it isn&#8217;t. I&#8217;ve been going crazy trying to find phones with the required feature, yet not having a camera. They&#8217;re so cheap to add and so many people go crazy over having a camera built in that&#8217;s it&#8217;s almost a no-brainer, but you would be cutting out most of the government, defense contractors, and other secure facility workers. Personally, I prefer without. I plan on being a long time BB supporter because of the cameraless option. Now I say option, because I thought I read another phone to be released shortly after with the camera feature available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-483601</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-483601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally work in a secure environment and there&#039;s no option of just turning off a camera feature. It&#039;s either there or it isn&#039;t. I&#039;ve been going crazy trying to find phones with the required feature, yet not having a camera. They&#039;re so cheap to add and so many people go crazy over having a camera built in that&#039;s it&#039;s almost a no-brainer, but you would be cutting out most of the government, defense contractors, and other secure facility workers. Personally, I prefer without. I plan on being a long time BB supporter because of the cameraless option. Now I say option, because I thought I read another phone to be released shortly after with the camera feature available.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally work in a secure environment and there&#8217;s no option of just turning off a camera feature. It&#8217;s either there or it isn&#8217;t. I&#8217;ve been going crazy trying to find phones with the required feature, yet not having a camera. They&#8217;re so cheap to add and so many people go crazy over having a camera built in that&#8217;s it&#8217;s almost a no-brainer, but you would be cutting out most of the government, defense contractors, and other secure facility workers. Personally, I prefer without. I plan on being a long time BB supporter because of the cameraless option. Now I say option, because I thought I read another phone to be released shortly after with the camera feature available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool &#187; Size up the competition with Size Easy</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-48324</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool &#187; Size up the competition with Size Easy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-48324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We&#8217;re easing you into the news really gently today. Neat little tidbit to start-off. Thought has sent us in a link to a site called Size Easy. Size Easy lets you enter dimensions of any product (say, a BlackBerry Pearl?) and compare it to other items (say, like, a 30 GB iPod and a deck of playing cards) - and you can see how your product&#8230; sizes up. Pretty interesting tool - maybe this is the wave of the future and will replace those side by side shots that are always floating around. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re easing you into the news really gently today. Neat little tidbit to start-off. Thought has sent us in a link to a site called Size Easy. Size Easy lets you enter dimensions of any product (say, a BlackBerry Pearl?) and compare it to other items (say, like, a 30 GB iPod and a deck of playing cards) &#8211; and you can see how your product&#8230; sizes up. Pretty interesting tool &#8211; maybe this is the wave of the future and will replace those side by side shots that are always floating around. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool &#187; RIM&#8217;s results cleverly called &#8220;Su-PEARL-ative&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-48004</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool &#187; RIM&#8217;s results cleverly called &#8220;Su-PEARL-ative&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-48004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Thought&#8217;s been working overtime and has been kind enough to slide us this article in the Wall Street Journal regarding RIM&#8217;s Q2 results. And since that&#8217;s all people seem to be talking about today in the BlackBerry world, we&#8217;ll fuel the fire with this. RBC Capital&#8217;s Mike Abramsky calls the results &#8220;Su-PEARL-ative&#8221;, and analysts are all-a-chatter with optimism for RIM.  UBS Investment&#8217;s Rob Dennison is forecasting a 45.9% replacement rate for the BlackBerry device in fiscal 2007 and 37.6% in fiscal 2008. &#8220;While the replacement rate now appears more reasonable relative to historical replacement rates, we believe our (fiscal 2008) implied replacement rate could again prove conservative,&#8221; he said in a note. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thought&#8217;s been working overtime and has been kind enough to slide us this article in the Wall Street Journal regarding RIM&#8217;s Q2 results. And since that&#8217;s all people seem to be talking about today in the BlackBerry world, we&#8217;ll fuel the fire with this. RBC Capital&#8217;s Mike Abramsky calls the results &#8220;Su-PEARL-ative&#8221;, and analysts are all-a-chatter with optimism for RIM.  UBS Investment&#8217;s Rob Dennison is forecasting a 45.9% replacement rate for the BlackBerry device in fiscal 2007 and 37.6% in fiscal 2008. &#8220;While the replacement rate now appears more reasonable relative to historical replacement rates, we believe our (fiscal 2008) implied replacement rate could again prove conservative,&#8221; he said in a note. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-47837</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-47837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just the beginning of RIM&#039;s intention to break the Blackberry in two segments: enterprise and consumers. 

They are just trying to figure a way to do it because the Blackberry brand is too popular to completely just drop. That&#039;s why we have the Blackberry Pearl and not the RIM Pearl. I figure that they will keep the model number for the 8800.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the beginning of RIM&#8217;s intention to break the Blackberry in two segments: enterprise and consumers. </p>
<p>They are just trying to figure a way to do it because the Blackberry brand is too popular to completely just drop. That&#8217;s why we have the Blackberry Pearl and not the RIM Pearl. I figure that they will keep the model number for the 8800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-483598</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-483598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just the beginning of RIM&#039;s intention to break the Blackberry in two segments: enterprise and consumers. 

They are just trying to figure a way to do it because the Blackberry brand is too popular to completely just drop. That&#039;s why we have the Blackberry Pearl and not the RIM Pearl. I figure that they will keep the model number for the 8800.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the beginning of RIM&#8217;s intention to break the Blackberry in two segments: enterprise and consumers. </p>
<p>They are just trying to figure a way to do it because the Blackberry brand is too popular to completely just drop. That&#8217;s why we have the Blackberry Pearl and not the RIM Pearl. I figure that they will keep the model number for the 8800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-483599</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-483599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just the beginning of RIM&#039;s intention to break the Blackberry in two segments: enterprise and consumers. 

They are just trying to figure a way to do it because the Blackberry brand is too popular to completely just drop. That&#039;s why we have the Blackberry Pearl and not the RIM Pearl. I figure that they will keep the model number for the 8800.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the beginning of RIM&#8217;s intention to break the Blackberry in two segments: enterprise and consumers. </p>
<p>They are just trying to figure a way to do it because the Blackberry brand is too popular to completely just drop. That&#8217;s why we have the Blackberry Pearl and not the RIM Pearl. I figure that they will keep the model number for the 8800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-483600</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-483600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just the beginning of RIM&#039;s intention to break the Blackberry in two segments: enterprise and consumers. 

They are just trying to figure a way to do it because the Blackberry brand is too popular to completely just drop. That&#039;s why we have the Blackberry Pearl and not the RIM Pearl. I figure that they will keep the model number for the 8800.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just the beginning of RIM&#8217;s intention to break the Blackberry in two segments: enterprise and consumers. </p>
<p>They are just trying to figure a way to do it because the Blackberry brand is too popular to completely just drop. That&#8217;s why we have the Blackberry Pearl and not the RIM Pearl. I figure that they will keep the model number for the 8800.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do CameraBerrys make cameraless BlackBerrys seem &#8220;Ho Hum&#8221;? &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-47788</link>
		<dc:creator>Do CameraBerrys make cameraless BlackBerrys seem &#8220;Ho Hum&#8221;? &#124; RIMarkable &#124; The official, unofficial BlackBerry Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-47788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Why then, would RIM continue to develop next-generation BlackBerrys that don&#8217;t have cameras? Thought, in his column over on BlackBerry Cool, has an interesting take on this and I agree with it completely. Simply put, if RIM sells a next-gen cameraless BlackBerry this year, a lot of people will buy it. If they sell a next-gen CameraBerry next year, a lot of people, including many of the ones who bought the cameraless device, will buy the camera bearing device as well. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why then, would RIM continue to develop next-generation BlackBerrys that don&#8217;t have cameras? Thought, in his column over on BlackBerry Cool, has an interesting take on this and I agree with it completely. Simply put, if RIM sells a next-gen cameraless BlackBerry this year, a lot of people will buy it. If they sell a next-gen CameraBerry next year, a lot of people, including many of the ones who bought the cameraless device, will buy the camera bearing device as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIMarkable</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/thoughtpiece-why-the-blackberry-8800-has-no-camera-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-47787</link>
		<dc:creator>RIMarkable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/09/27/002355/#comment-47787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Do CameraBerrys make cameraless BlackBerrys seem &quot;Ho Hum&quot;?&lt;/strong&gt;

Research in Motion released the BlackBerry Pearl a couple of weeks ago and by all accounts it is doing incredibly well.  So well, in fact, that a recurring them in several of the BlackBerry message boards is that all new BlackBerrys should come with ca...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Do CameraBerrys make cameraless BlackBerrys seem &#8220;Ho Hum&#8221;?</strong></p>
<p>Research in Motion released the BlackBerry Pearl a couple of weeks ago and by all accounts it is doing incredibly well.  So well, in fact, that a recurring them in several of the BlackBerry message boards is that all new BlackBerrys should come with ca&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
