<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NTP turns attention to Palm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/07/ntp-takes-on-palm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/07/ntp-takes-on-palm/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerryCool &#187; Palm responds to NTP&#8217;s claim</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/07/ntp-takes-on-palm/comment-page-1/#comment-56231</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerryCool &#187; Palm responds to NTP&#8217;s claim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 13:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/07/002686/#comment-56231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Would NTP really be attacking these companies if they weren&#8217;t as large as they are? I vote no, who&#8217;s with me. As reported earlier this week, NTP, the same company that sued RIM over various patent issues, is going to bat again - this time with Palm - and Palm really wants them to strike out. In an article found on Geek.com, Palm says the patents in question have already been ruled invalid by re-examiners at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and that&#8217;s not all. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Would NTP really be attacking these companies if they weren&#8217;t as large as they are? I vote no, who&#8217;s with me. As reported earlier this week, NTP, the same company that sued RIM over various patent issues, is going to bat again &#8211; this time with Palm &#8211; and Palm really wants them to strike out. In an article found on Geek.com, Palm says the patents in question have already been ruled invalid by re-examiners at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and that&#8217;s not all. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerryCool &#187; Antenna makes appearance on BlackBerry 8703e</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/07/ntp-takes-on-palm/comment-page-1/#comment-55597</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerryCool &#187; Antenna makes appearance on BlackBerry 8703e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/07/002686/#comment-55597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The BlackBerry 8703e may have been spending too much time with Ms. Ashlee Simpson (second pop star reference of the day - oh dear) and got a little work done. Engadget points us to Sprint&#8217;s site where the formerly sleek and stylish 8703e has apparently adopted an obtrusive stub antenna. What exactly is all this about? The source speculates about the need for GPS reception or the possibility of a new model surfacing. I don&#8217;t care what it&#8217;s for - just get it off! GET IT OFF! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The BlackBerry 8703e may have been spending too much time with Ms. Ashlee Simpson (second pop star reference of the day &#8211; oh dear) and got a little work done. Engadget points us to Sprint&#8217;s site where the formerly sleek and stylish 8703e has apparently adopted an obtrusive stub antenna. What exactly is all this about? The source speculates about the need for GPS reception or the possibility of a new model surfacing. I don&#8217;t care what it&#8217;s for &#8211; just get it off! GET IT OFF! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
