<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekend Contest: Patent Wars 2 &#8211; Palm vs. NTP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerryCool &#187; Weekend Contest: Accessorize, accessorize, accessorize</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-57262</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerryCool &#187; Weekend Contest: Accessorize, accessorize, accessorize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-57262</guid>
		<description>[...] Last week we asked you folks what you thought Palm should do against NTP. Well, we haven&#8217;t heard any rumblings about the case this week, but Mark had some solid views on the matter. He&#8217;s like Superman - all for the greater good.  &#8220;For the greater good it is important for Palm to fight and for Palm to win â€¦ win big! The continued abuse of patent law not only discredits the patent process in general but ties up valuable resources that could better be allocated to reviewing new incoming patents or to overhauling and streamlining the entire system.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last week we asked you folks what you thought Palm should do against NTP. Well, we haven&#8217;t heard any rumblings about the case this week, but Mark had some solid views on the matter. He&#8217;s like Superman &#8211; all for the greater good.  &#8220;For the greater good it is important for Palm to fight and for Palm to win â€¦ win big! The continued abuse of patent law not only discredits the patent process in general but ties up valuable resources that could better be allocated to reviewing new incoming patents or to overhauling and streamlining the entire system.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc C.</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-56905</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-56905</guid>
		<description>I recommend Palm to be taken over by RIM ;-). 

As NTP and RIM have a definitive settlement for past and future claims, I assume it will put NTP in a tricky position for this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend Palm to be taken over by RIM <img src='http://www.blackberrycool.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . </p>
<p>As NTP and RIM have a definitive settlement for past and future claims, I assume it will put NTP in a tricky position for this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc C.</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-484030</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-484030</guid>
		<description>I recommend Palm to be taken over by RIM ;-). 

As NTP and RIM have a definitive settlement for past and future claims, I assume it will put NTP in a tricky position for this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend Palm to be taken over by RIM <img src='http://www.blackberrycool.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . </p>
<p>As NTP and RIM have a definitive settlement for past and future claims, I assume it will put NTP in a tricky position for this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerryCool &#187; Weekend Contest reminder</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-56904</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerryCool &#187; Weekend Contest reminder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 13:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-56904</guid>
		<description>[...] Just a heads up to those of you expecting a ThoughtPiece this week - it&#8217;s not happening. The think tank was too much and Thought&#8217;s taken off for some mental relaxation and will be back next week for more industry analysis. We&#8217;ll take the open opportunity to remind you about our Weekend Contest. The question this week asks what you think Palm should do against NTP&#8217;s patent suit? Lay down? Pull a Braveheart? Check out the contest here - we accept entries until Friday every week. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just a heads up to those of you expecting a ThoughtPiece this week &#8211; it&#8217;s not happening. The think tank was too much and Thought&#8217;s taken off for some mental relaxation and will be back next week for more industry analysis. We&#8217;ll take the open opportunity to remind you about our Weekend Contest. The question this week asks what you think Palm should do against NTP&#8217;s patent suit? Lay down? Pull a Braveheart? Check out the contest here &#8211; we accept entries until Friday every week. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hutchison</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-56305</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hutchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-56305</guid>
		<description>For the greater good it is important for Palm to fight and for Palm to win ... win big! The continued abuse of patent law not only discredits the patent process in general but ties up valuable resources that could better be allocated to reviewing new incoming patents or to overhauling and streamlining the entire system.

From a corporate standpoint, however, Palm&#039;s best course of action is, unfortunatly, less clear. Fighting NTP in the courts would be an expensive and time consuming endeavour. The progression and final outcome of RIM&#039;s battle with NTP is an extremly discouraging precedent to follow. A quick and quiet settlement would probably be the safest bet for Palm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the greater good it is important for Palm to fight and for Palm to win &#8230; win big! The continued abuse of patent law not only discredits the patent process in general but ties up valuable resources that could better be allocated to reviewing new incoming patents or to overhauling and streamlining the entire system.</p>
<p>From a corporate standpoint, however, Palm&#8217;s best course of action is, unfortunatly, less clear. Fighting NTP in the courts would be an expensive and time consuming endeavour. The progression and final outcome of RIM&#8217;s battle with NTP is an extremly discouraging precedent to follow. A quick and quiet settlement would probably be the safest bet for Palm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hutchison</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-484028</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hutchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-484028</guid>
		<description>For the greater good it is important for Palm to fight and for Palm to win ... win big! The continued abuse of patent law not only discredits the patent process in general but ties up valuable resources that could better be allocated to reviewing new incoming patents or to overhauling and streamlining the entire system.

From a corporate standpoint, however, Palm&#039;s best course of action is, unfortunatly, less clear. Fighting NTP in the courts would be an expensive and time consuming endeavour. The progression and final outcome of RIM&#039;s battle with NTP is an extremly discouraging precedent to follow. A quick and quiet settlement would probably be the safest bet for Palm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the greater good it is important for Palm to fight and for Palm to win &#8230; win big! The continued abuse of patent law not only discredits the patent process in general but ties up valuable resources that could better be allocated to reviewing new incoming patents or to overhauling and streamlining the entire system.</p>
<p>From a corporate standpoint, however, Palm&#8217;s best course of action is, unfortunatly, less clear. Fighting NTP in the courts would be an expensive and time consuming endeavour. The progression and final outcome of RIM&#8217;s battle with NTP is an extremly discouraging precedent to follow. A quick and quiet settlement would probably be the safest bet for Palm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hutchison</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-484029</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hutchison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-484029</guid>
		<description>For the greater good it is important for Palm to fight and for Palm to win ... win big! The continued abuse of patent law not only discredits the patent process in general but ties up valuable resources that could better be allocated to reviewing new incoming patents or to overhauling and streamlining the entire system.

From a corporate standpoint, however, Palm&#039;s best course of action is, unfortunatly, less clear. Fighting NTP in the courts would be an expensive and time consuming endeavour. The progression and final outcome of RIM&#039;s battle with NTP is an extremly discouraging precedent to follow. A quick and quiet settlement would probably be the safest bet for Palm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the greater good it is important for Palm to fight and for Palm to win &#8230; win big! The continued abuse of patent law not only discredits the patent process in general but ties up valuable resources that could better be allocated to reviewing new incoming patents or to overhauling and streamlining the entire system.</p>
<p>From a corporate standpoint, however, Palm&#8217;s best course of action is, unfortunatly, less clear. Fighting NTP in the courts would be an expensive and time consuming endeavour. The progression and final outcome of RIM&#8217;s battle with NTP is an extremly discouraging precedent to follow. A quick and quiet settlement would probably be the safest bet for Palm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marco</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-56291</link>
		<dc:creator>marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 01:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-56291</guid>
		<description>i think that palm should just lay down on this one. because when blackberry first lost there case to NTP they only had to pay $26,000 but since they decided to appeal look what happend they had to 620 million so i think that palm should really look at that and just settle with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that palm should just lay down on this one. because when blackberry first lost there case to NTP they only had to pay $26,000 but since they decided to appeal look what happend they had to 620 million so i think that palm should really look at that and just settle with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marco</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/comment-page-1/#comment-484027</link>
		<dc:creator>marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/002718/#comment-484027</guid>
		<description>i think that palm should just lay down on this one. because when blackberry first lost there case to NTP they only had to pay $26,000 but since they decided to appeal look what happend they had to 620 million so i think that palm should really look at that and just settle with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that palm should just lay down on this one. because when blackberry first lost there case to NTP they only had to pay $26,000 but since they decided to appeal look what happend they had to 620 million so i think that palm should really look at that and just settle with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blackberrycool.com/2006/11/10/weekend-contest-patent-wars-2-palm-vs-ntp/feed/ ) in 0.53548 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 1:35 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 2:35 pm UTC -->
