Comments on: Protect your BlackBerry against DST http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/03/09/protect-your-blackberry-against-dst/ The voice of the BlackBerry community. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Matt Spong http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/03/09/protect-your-blackberry-against-dst/comment-page-1/#comment-97701 Matt Spong Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:29:39 +0000 http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/03/09/003820/#comment-97701 I installed this yesterday, and it broke all my recurring appointments - starting next week, all my recurring appointments were an hour ahead (only on the BlackBerry - not on the Exchange server or in Outlook). I had to delete and recreate them all in order for them to be correct. What decade is this again? Shouldn't this stuff be sorted out by now? I installed this yesterday, and it broke all my recurring appointments – starting next week, all my recurring appointments were an hour ahead (only on the BlackBerry – not on the Exchange server or in Outlook). I had to delete and recreate them all in order for them to be correct.

What decade is this again? Shouldn’t this stuff be sorted out by now?

]]> By: Matt Spong http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/03/09/protect-your-blackberry-against-dst/comment-page-1/#comment-485448 Matt Spong Fri, 09 Mar 2007 16:29:00 +0000 http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/03/09/003820/#comment-485448 I installed this yesterday, and it broke all my recurring appointments - starting next week, all my recurring appointments were an hour ahead (only on the BlackBerry - not on the Exchange server or in Outlook). I had to delete and recreate them all in order for them to be correct. What decade is this again? Shouldn't this stuff be sorted out by now? I installed this yesterday, and it broke all my recurring appointments – starting next week, all my recurring appointments were an hour ahead (only on the BlackBerry – not on the Exchange server or in Outlook). I had to delete and recreate them all in order for them to be correct.

What decade is this again? Shouldn’t this stuff be sorted out by now?

]]>