<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BlackBerry 8800 rocks PC World&#8217;s roost</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/05/blackberry-8800-rocks-pc-worlds-roost/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/05/blackberry-8800-rocks-pc-worlds-roost/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackberry Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/05/blackberry-8800-rocks-pc-worlds-roost/#comment-133118</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackberry Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 14:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/05/22/004566/#comment-133118</guid>
		<description>The 8800 being #5 is a crock even to the biggest Blackberry fan boy.

RIM is probably one of their bigger advertisers thus ranking them so high. I could probably live with the Curve being top 5 but the 8800 is nothing special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 8800 being #5 is a crock even to the biggest Blackberry fan boy.</p>
<p>RIM is probably one of their bigger advertisers thus ranking them so high. I could probably live with the Curve being top 5 but the 8800 is nothing special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jibi@bbc</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/05/blackberry-8800-rocks-pc-worlds-roost/#comment-132984</link>
		<dc:creator>jibi@bbc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 03:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/05/22/004566/#comment-132984</guid>
		<description>I think a Top 5 finish is high enough, although I think the Curve deserves a higher ranking (until something else is released later this year). The Intel Core 2 Duo should drop, as should FiOS. Google Apps is deservedly numero uno, although I'm not sure how GMail and Maps for Mobile ended up so low in the pecking order.

Needless to say, I think releasing a 'Best of' list less than halfway through the year is a wee bit premature, but then again, I suppose that's an easy way to make a buck (as seen by my (and your) accessing PC World's list).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a Top 5 finish is high enough, although I think the Curve deserves a higher ranking (until something else is released later this year). The Intel Core 2 Duo should drop, as should FiOS. Google Apps is deservedly numero uno, although I&#8217;m not sure how GMail and Maps for Mobile ended up so low in the pecking order.</p>
<p>Needless to say, I think releasing a &#8216;Best of&#8217; list less than halfway through the year is a wee bit premature, but then again, I suppose that&#8217;s an easy way to make a buck (as seen by my (and your) accessing PC World&#8217;s list).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
