Comments on: Musicphones underrated?

By: Jasmine

Jasmine — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:15:38 +0000

I usually don?t post in Blogs but your blog forced me to, amazing work.. beautiful ?

By: Jasmine

Jasmine — Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:15:00 +0000

I usually don?t post in Blogs but your blog forced me to, amazing work.. beautiful ?

By: Gunnar Gilmore

Gunnar Gilmore — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:40:49 +0000

Because this IS a .exe file – it won?t affect my mac right?

By: Gunnar Gilmore

Gunnar Gilmore — Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:40:00 +0000

Because this IS a .exe file – it won?t affect my mac right?

By: Robb (RIMarkable)

Robb (RIMarkable) — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:23:25 +0000

I think that many of the music phones out there are like first geneartion camera phones… They are cool to have, but, just not all that funtional and practical. OTA downloads are till fairly expensive, not to mention the increase data charges you incur when downloading.

You would probably find that the overwhelming majarity of music playing cell phone owners probably own iPods as well. Even though they may have initially thought that their new music phone would replace their iPod, iTunes is just better than music download services offered by the mobile phone companies.

Lastly, the iPhone, is just a better MP3 player most music phones so it is easy so how most people would use their tried and true iPhones after the novelty of their music phones wears off.

By: Robb (RIMarkable)

Robb (RIMarkable) — Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:23:00 +0000

Lastly, the iPhone, is just a better MP3 player most music phones so it is easy so how most people would use their tried and true iPhones after the novelty of their music phones wears off.