<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security firm publishes whitepaper on BlackBerry Trojan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: axxo1</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-258206</link>
		<dc:creator>axxo1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-258206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article was posted in order to make the people understand that blackberry hacking has started! Up till now except few geeky people, rest of the world was in the impression that Blackberry is most secure mobile device. This whitepaper was to make everyone understand it is not so. 

What you people can best do is comment on what initiatives to inform the users are taking place and slinging it with plagiarism. Rather than you stepping forward and making your findings addressed to all, about say for example the blackberry hacking, what you can best do is come out and find something to castigate upon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was posted in order to make the people understand that blackberry hacking has started! Up till now except few geeky people, rest of the world was in the impression that Blackberry is most secure mobile device. This whitepaper was to make everyone understand it is not so. </p>
<p>What you people can best do is comment on what initiatives to inform the users are taking place and slinging it with plagiarism. Rather than you stepping forward and making your findings addressed to all, about say for example the blackberry hacking, what you can best do is come out and find something to castigate upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: axxo1</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-488699</link>
		<dc:creator>axxo1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-488699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article was posted in order to make the people understand that blackberry hacking has started! Up till now except few geeky people, rest of the world was in the impression that Blackberry is most secure mobile device. This whitepaper was to make everyone understand it is not so. 

What you people can best do is comment on what initiatives to inform the users are taking place and slinging it with plagiarism. Rather than you stepping forward and making your findings addressed to all, about say for example the blackberry hacking, what you can best do is come out and find something to castigate upon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was posted in order to make the people understand that blackberry hacking has started! Up till now except few geeky people, rest of the world was in the impression that Blackberry is most secure mobile device. This whitepaper was to make everyone understand it is not so. </p>
<p>What you people can best do is comment on what initiatives to inform the users are taking place and slinging it with plagiarism. Rather than you stepping forward and making your findings addressed to all, about say for example the blackberry hacking, what you can best do is come out and find something to castigate upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Trojan Malware &#124; MobiShark Blackberry Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-257900</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Trojan Malware &#124; MobiShark Blackberry Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-257900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] was a reported some time back  by InfoWorld and now by the BlackBerry Cool about a BlackBerry [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a reported some time back  by InfoWorld and now by the BlackBerry Cool about a BlackBerry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bla1ze</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-257219</link>
		<dc:creator>Bla1ze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-257219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm…I find it rather weird that this information comes from a site from India, especially with the current BlackBerry issues in India atm...this breaks down to India is having issues with RIM atm..and this Trojan news comes from out of nowhere again..the last trojan on BB information was from 2006…as prev stated so this is pulling up some old crap

Food for thought if ya ask me..especially with the plagerism claims as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm…I find it rather weird that this information comes from a site from India, especially with the current BlackBerry issues in India atm&#8230;this breaks down to India is having issues with RIM atm..and this Trojan news comes from out of nowhere again..the last trojan on BB information was from 2006…as prev stated so this is pulling up some old crap</p>
<p>Food for thought if ya ask me..especially with the plagerism claims as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bla1ze</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-488697</link>
		<dc:creator>Bla1ze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-488697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm…I find it rather weird that this information comes from a site from India, especially with the current BlackBerry issues in India atm...this breaks down to India is having issues with RIM atm..and this Trojan news comes from out of nowhere again..the last trojan on BB information was from 2006…as prev stated so this is pulling up some old crap

Food for thought if ya ask me..especially with the plagerism claims as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm…I find it rather weird that this information comes from a site from India, especially with the current BlackBerry issues in India atm&#8230;this breaks down to India is having issues with RIM atm..and this Trojan news comes from out of nowhere again..the last trojan on BB information was from 2006…as prev stated so this is pulling up some old crap</p>
<p>Food for thought if ya ask me..especially with the plagerism claims as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bla1ze</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-488698</link>
		<dc:creator>Bla1ze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 05:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-488698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm…I find it rather weird that this information comes from a site from India, especially with the current BlackBerry issues in India atm...this breaks down to India is having issues with RIM atm..and this Trojan news comes from out of nowhere again..the last trojan on BB information was from 2006…as prev stated so this is pulling up some old crap

Food for thought if ya ask me..especially with the plagerism claims as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm…I find it rather weird that this information comes from a site from India, especially with the current BlackBerry issues in India atm&#8230;this breaks down to India is having issues with RIM atm..and this Trojan news comes from out of nowhere again..the last trojan on BB information was from 2006…as prev stated so this is pulling up some old crap</p>
<p>Food for thought if ya ask me..especially with the plagerism claims as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-256892</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-256892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your original comment was on the linked post from November ( http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/11/28/006149/ ). 

Thanks for noticing the plagiarism there, we&#039;ll be sure to let the guys at PDAStreet know.

As for newsworthiness, I think the real news is more about APPIN posting a Whitepaper about BBProxy, which we covered when it initially came out ( http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/08/14/002133/ ), rather than about BBProxy itself. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your original comment was on the linked post from November ( <a href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/11/28/006149/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/11/28/006149/</a> ). </p>
<p>Thanks for noticing the plagiarism there, we&#8217;ll be sure to let the guys at PDAStreet know.</p>
<p>As for newsworthiness, I think the real news is more about APPIN posting a Whitepaper about BBProxy, which we covered when it initially came out ( <a href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/08/14/002133/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/08/14/002133/</a> ), rather than about BBProxy itself. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-488696</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-488696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your original comment was on the linked post from November ( http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/11/28/006149/ ). 

Thanks for noticing the plagiarism there, we&#039;ll be sure to let the guys at PDAStreet know.

As for newsworthiness, I think the real news is more about APPIN posting a Whitepaper about BBProxy, which we covered when it initially came out ( http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/08/14/002133/ ), rather than about BBProxy itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your original comment was on the linked post from November ( <a href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/11/28/006149/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2007/11/28/006149/</a> ). </p>
<p>Thanks for noticing the plagiarism there, we&#8217;ll be sure to let the guys at PDAStreet know.</p>
<p>As for newsworthiness, I think the real news is more about APPIN posting a Whitepaper about BBProxy, which we covered when it initially came out ( <a href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/08/14/002133/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2006/08/14/002133/</a> ), rather than about BBProxy itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ummm...</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-256824</link>
		<dc:creator>Ummm...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:36:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-256824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t really news... this was first reported Aug 2006. Here&#039;s another article with the same &quot;hack&quot; described:
http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html

RIM shot this &quot;hack&quot; down years ago so I would hardly call it news.

The article you linked to actually plagiarized the site I linked above word for word.

Check &quot;The BlackBerry server and mail server should also not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to the internal network or Internet, and internal users should not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to either the BlackBerry server or mail server. &quot;

and check &quot;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users within the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community. &quot; versus &quot;&quot;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users with in the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community,&quot; Totzke said .&quot;

I&#039;d say pull the article before you embarrass yourself. Why did my first comment including this data get pulled? There were about 5 responses to this that disappeared.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t really news&#8230; this was first reported Aug 2006. Here&#8217;s another article with the same &#8220;hack&#8221; described:<br />
<a href="http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html</a></p>
<p>RIM shot this &#8220;hack&#8221; down years ago so I would hardly call it news.</p>
<p>The article you linked to actually plagiarized the site I linked above word for word.</p>
<p>Check &#8220;The BlackBerry server and mail server should also not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to the internal network or Internet, and internal users should not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to either the BlackBerry server or mail server. &#8221;</p>
<p>and check &#8220;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users within the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community. &#8221; versus &#8220;&#8221;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users with in the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community,&#8221; Totzke said .&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say pull the article before you embarrass yourself. Why did my first comment including this data get pulled? There were about 5 responses to this that disappeared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ummm...</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-488693</link>
		<dc:creator>Ummm...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-488693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t really news... this was first reported Aug 2006. Here&#039;s another article with the same &quot;hack&quot; described:
http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html

RIM shot this &quot;hack&quot; down years ago so I would hardly call it news.

The article you linked to actually plagiarized the site I linked above word for word.

Check &quot;The BlackBerry server and mail server should also not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to the internal network or Internet, and internal users should not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to either the BlackBerry server or mail server. &quot;

and check &quot;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users within the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community. &quot; versus &quot;&quot;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users with in the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community,&quot; Totzke said .&quot;

I&#039;d say pull the article before you embarrass yourself. Why did my first comment including this data get pulled? There were about 5 responses to this that disappeared.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t really news&#8230; this was first reported Aug 2006. Here&#8217;s another article with the same &#8220;hack&#8221; described:<br />
<a href="http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html</a></p>
<p>RIM shot this &#8220;hack&#8221; down years ago so I would hardly call it news.</p>
<p>The article you linked to actually plagiarized the site I linked above word for word.</p>
<p>Check &#8220;The BlackBerry server and mail server should also not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to the internal network or Internet, and internal users should not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to either the BlackBerry server or mail server. &#8221;</p>
<p>and check &#8220;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users within the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community. &#8221; versus &#8220;&#8221;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users with in the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community,&#8221; Totzke said .&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say pull the article before you embarrass yourself. Why did my first comment including this data get pulled? There were about 5 responses to this that disappeared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ummm...</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-488694</link>
		<dc:creator>Ummm...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-488694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t really news... this was first reported Aug 2006. Here&#039;s another article with the same &quot;hack&quot; described:
http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html

RIM shot this &quot;hack&quot; down years ago so I would hardly call it news.

The article you linked to actually plagiarized the site I linked above word for word.

Check &quot;The BlackBerry server and mail server should also not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to the internal network or Internet, and internal users should not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to either the BlackBerry server or mail server. &quot;

and check &quot;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users within the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community. &quot; versus &quot;&quot;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users with in the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community,&quot; Totzke said .&quot;

I&#039;d say pull the article before you embarrass yourself. Why did my first comment including this data get pulled? There were about 5 responses to this that disappeared.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t really news&#8230; this was first reported Aug 2006. Here&#8217;s another article with the same &#8220;hack&#8221; described:<br />
<a href="http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html</a></p>
<p>RIM shot this &#8220;hack&#8221; down years ago so I would hardly call it news.</p>
<p>The article you linked to actually plagiarized the site I linked above word for word.</p>
<p>Check &#8220;The BlackBerry server and mail server should also not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to the internal network or Internet, and internal users should not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to either the BlackBerry server or mail server. &#8221;</p>
<p>and check &#8220;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users within the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community. &#8221; versus &#8220;&#8221;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users with in the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community,&#8221; Totzke said .&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say pull the article before you embarrass yourself. Why did my first comment including this data get pulled? There were about 5 responses to this that disappeared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ummm...</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/the-first-blackberry-trojan-sort-of/comment-page-1/#comment-488695</link>
		<dc:creator>Ummm...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/03/14/006785/#comment-488695</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn&#039;t really news... this was first reported Aug 2006. Here&#039;s another article with the same &quot;hack&quot; described:
http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html

RIM shot this &quot;hack&quot; down years ago so I would hardly call it news.

The article you linked to actually plagiarized the site I linked above word for word.

Check &quot;The BlackBerry server and mail server should also not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to the internal network or Internet, and internal users should not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to either the BlackBerry server or mail server. &quot;

and check &quot;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users within the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community. &quot; versus &quot;&quot;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users with in the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community,&quot; Totzke said .&quot;

I&#039;d say pull the article before you embarrass yourself. Why did my first comment including this data get pulled? There were about 5 responses to this that disappeared.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t really news&#8230; this was first reported Aug 2006. Here&#8217;s another article with the same &#8220;hack&#8221; described:<br />
<a href="http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdastreet.com/articles/2006/8/2006-8-9-BBProxy-Hack-Exposes.html</a></p>
<p>RIM shot this &#8220;hack&#8221; down years ago so I would hardly call it news.</p>
<p>The article you linked to actually plagiarized the site I linked above word for word.</p>
<p>Check &#8220;The BlackBerry server and mail server should also not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to the internal network or Internet, and internal users should not be permitted to open arbitrary connections to either the BlackBerry server or mail server. &#8221;</p>
<p>and check &#8220;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users within the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community. &#8221; versus &#8220;&#8221;There is something like 250 plus commands that allow the administrator to have full control over how the BlackBerry as a platform is used by the users with in the BlackBerry Enterprise Server community,&#8221; Totzke said .&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say pull the article before you embarrass yourself. Why did my first comment including this data get pulled? There were about 5 responses to this that disappeared.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
