<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint pawning off cell towers for $670 mil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/07/25/sprint-pawning-off-cell-towers-for-670-mil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/07/25/sprint-pawning-off-cell-towers-for-670-mil/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:37:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprint sells 3,000 towers to TowerCo &#124; BlackBerry Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/07/25/sprint-pawning-off-cell-towers-for-670-mil/comment-page-1/#comment-317312</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprint sells 3,000 towers to TowerCo &#124; BlackBerry Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=7901#comment-317312</guid>
		<description>[...] Sprint&#8217;s future today. Cellular-News is reporting that Sprint Nextel has completed the previously announced sale of approximately 3,080 towers to TowerCo for an estimated US$670 million in cash. The two companies [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sprint&#8217;s future today. Cellular-News is reporting that Sprint Nextel has completed the previously announced sale of approximately 3,080 towers to TowerCo for an estimated US$670 million in cash. The two companies [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris L</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2008/07/25/sprint-pawning-off-cell-towers-for-670-mil/comment-page-1/#comment-308621</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=7901#comment-308621</guid>
		<description>Ehhhh....we don&#039;t know the particulars of the agreement, but I&#039;d venture its not a good sign....

If they are desperate for the capital, its like reverse mortgaging your house. Not a good idea unless you&#039;re almost dead.

If they aren&#039;t desperate for the capital, then obviously this TowerCo can do it cheaper than they can. To me, that says they aren&#039;t geared for efficiency, good organization, or any other good characteristics. Its not like outsourcing the IT or HR needs of a small company, we&#039;re talking the bread and butter function. If 3M can outsource production of their sticky pads, it would raise serious questions about 3M&#039;s viability.

Of course, on the optimistic side, it could mean they are rolling out LTE or WiMax or something and have it ready to go, and just don&#039;t want to deal with their legacy network themselves anymore. Right? Please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehhhh&#8230;.we don&#8217;t know the particulars of the agreement, but I&#8217;d venture its not a good sign&#8230;.</p>
<p>If they are desperate for the capital, its like reverse mortgaging your house. Not a good idea unless you&#8217;re almost dead.</p>
<p>If they aren&#8217;t desperate for the capital, then obviously this TowerCo can do it cheaper than they can. To me, that says they aren&#8217;t geared for efficiency, good organization, or any other good characteristics. Its not like outsourcing the IT or HR needs of a small company, we&#8217;re talking the bread and butter function. If 3M can outsource production of their sticky pads, it would raise serious questions about 3M&#8217;s viability.</p>
<p>Of course, on the optimistic side, it could mean they are rolling out LTE or WiMax or something and have it ready to go, and just don&#8217;t want to deal with their legacy network themselves anymore. Right? Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
