http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/10/blackberry-9300-is-not-the-gemini-we-were-right/ The voice of the BlackBerry community. Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:22:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/10/blackberry-9300-is-not-the-gemini-we-were-right/comment-page-1/#comment-416336 New “CrackBerry” 3G Curve | THE MODLINE Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:45:18 +0000 http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10312#comment-416336 [...] and several BB fansites have shared their anticipation over its release. www.blackberrycool.com has quashed the “Gemini” as a codename for the BlackBerry 8325. So, basically [...] [...] and several BB fansites have shared their anticipation over its release. http://www.blackberrycool.com has quashed the “Gemini” as a codename for the BlackBerry 8325. So, basically [...]

]]> http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/10/blackberry-9300-is-not-the-gemini-we-were-right/comment-page-1/#comment-334566 Nikolaus Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:00:47 +0000 http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10312#comment-334566 No T-Mo No!!! The 8320 was good enough, there is no need for the 8325! Let's get the 8900 roll'n and then the 3G version (9220?) No T-Mo No!!! The 8320 was good enough, there is no need for the 8325! Let’s get the 8900 roll’n and then the 3G version (9220?)

]]> http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/10/blackberry-9300-is-not-the-gemini-we-were-right/comment-page-1/#comment-495537 Nikolaus Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:00:00 +0000 http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10312#comment-495537 No T-Mo No!!! The 8320 was good enough, there is no need for the 8325! Let's get the 8900 roll'n and then the 3G version (9220?) No T-Mo No!!! The 8320 was good enough, there is no need for the 8325! Let’s get the 8900 roll’n and then the 3G version (9220?)

]]> http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/10/blackberry-9300-is-not-the-gemini-we-were-right/comment-page-1/#comment-495538 Nikolaus Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:00:00 +0000 http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10312#comment-495538 No T-Mo No!!! The 8320 was good enough, there is no need for the 8325! Let's get the 8900 roll'n and then the 3G version (9220?) No T-Mo No!!! The 8320 was good enough, there is no need for the 8325! Let’s get the 8900 roll’n and then the 3G version (9220?)

]]> http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/10/blackberry-9300-is-not-the-gemini-we-were-right/comment-page-1/#comment-334507 DavidB Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:01:28 +0000 http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10312#comment-334507 8325 seems pointless. Totally. 8325 seems pointless. Totally.

]]> http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/10/blackberry-9300-is-not-the-gemini-we-were-right/comment-page-1/#comment-495536 DavidB Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:01:00 +0000 http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10312#comment-495536 8325 seems pointless. Totally. 8325 seems pointless. Totally.

]]>