<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BOLT BlackBerry Browser now in public beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: M to the K</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-335354</link>
		<dc:creator>M to the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10374#comment-335354</guid>
		<description>Amen to that, Gareth. There&#039;s no way a simple java app will beat RIM&#039;s browser. Now if only Skyfire would consider working on a BB beta...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that, Gareth. There&#8217;s no way a simple java app will beat RIM&#8217;s browser. Now if only Skyfire would consider working on a BB beta&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M to the K</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-495617</link>
		<dc:creator>M to the K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10374#comment-495617</guid>
		<description>Amen to that, Gareth. There&#039;s no way a simple java app will beat RIM&#039;s browser. Now if only Skyfire would consider working on a BB beta...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that, Gareth. There&#8217;s no way a simple java app will beat RIM&#8217;s browser. Now if only Skyfire would consider working on a BB beta&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-335336</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10374#comment-335336</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Gareth about the fact that there is no improvement over the native BB browser. It also seemed to keep having connectivity problems with it on my 8320 (bearing in mind that Mini Opera worked perfectly from the get go) and I lacked the time and inclination to play around with it. Whilst I understand that it&#039;s BETA software I don&#039;t think it should fall at the first hurdle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Gareth about the fact that there is no improvement over the native BB browser. It also seemed to keep having connectivity problems with it on my 8320 (bearing in mind that Mini Opera worked perfectly from the get go) and I lacked the time and inclination to play around with it. Whilst I understand that it&#8217;s BETA software I don&#8217;t think it should fall at the first hurdle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-495616</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10374#comment-495616</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Gareth about the fact that there is no improvement over the native BB browser. It also seemed to keep having connectivity problems with it on my 8320 (bearing in mind that Mini Opera worked perfectly from the get go) and I lacked the time and inclination to play around with it. Whilst I understand that it&#039;s BETA software I don&#039;t think it should fall at the first hurdle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Gareth about the fact that there is no improvement over the native BB browser. It also seemed to keep having connectivity problems with it on my 8320 (bearing in mind that Mini Opera worked perfectly from the get go) and I lacked the time and inclination to play around with it. Whilst I understand that it&#8217;s BETA software I don&#8217;t think it should fall at the first hurdle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-335257</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10374#comment-335257</guid>
		<description>It looks tacky, they need to improve on the font rendering but overall it has no appeal for me. There is no improved performance over the native browser they claim it does.The cursor browsing is by far better in the native browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks tacky, they need to improve on the font rendering but overall it has no appeal for me. There is no improved performance over the native browser they claim it does.The cursor browsing is by far better in the native browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-495614</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10374#comment-495614</guid>
		<description>It looks tacky, they need to improve on the font rendering but overall it has no appeal for me. There is no improved performance over the native browser they claim it does.The cursor browsing is by far better in the native browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks tacky, they need to improve on the font rendering but overall it has no appeal for me. There is no improved performance over the native browser they claim it does.The cursor browsing is by far better in the native browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/comment-page-1/#comment-495615</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=10374#comment-495615</guid>
		<description>It looks tacky, they need to improve on the font rendering but overall it has no appeal for me. There is no improved performance over the native browser they claim it does.The cursor browsing is by far better in the native browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks tacky, they need to improve on the font rendering but overall it has no appeal for me. There is no improved performance over the native browser they claim it does.The cursor browsing is by far better in the native browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blackberrycool.com/2009/02/16/bolt-blackberry-browser-now-in-public-beta/feed/ ) in 0.46039 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 2:16 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 3:16 pm UTC -->
