Monthly Archive for October, 2009Page 15 of 21

White BlackBerry Bold goes to Korea with SK Telecom

Comments

HousingWhiteBBBold

The white BlackBerry Bold 9000, which was one of the few BlackBerry related pieces of news we saw from CTIA, will be showing up for sale in Korea via SK Telecom.

The device will be available at the end of October and the first 1,000 customers will get a free BlackBerry Horizontal Leather Pouch.

It will be interesting to see how well the Bold sells in South Korea as it’s a country with a very predefined mobile culture. Many of the devices come with TV receivers and the Korean language is almost better suited to a keypad. That being said, there are a great number of ex-pats and Korean businessmen who would love this device.

Carriers and third parties need to prove they can restore our data

Comments

bes_41_arch_diagram

Recently, T-Mobile USA had to admit that they lost personal data belonging to Sidekick customers and only a small fraction of it could be recovered. The news resulted in damaging PR for the carrier, as well as tangible financial losses as they offered customers a $100 customer appreciation card, in addition to a free month of data service.

This news, while it did not affect BlackBerry users, leaves us wondering just how secure is our data? A BlackBerry can store your data, back it up to a computer, or connect to a server such as Rackspace, which can offer Microsoft Exchange storing and restoring of your data. App World adds a new dimension to our data storage as we now have a plethora of applications taking control of our data storage and restoration as well.

As applications become increasingly popular, with data being increasingly stored on the cloud, we are trusting these organizations to keep our personal data safe.

When speaking with Jasmine Noel of Ptak, Noel and Associates, it became very apparent that there doesn’t seem to be any standards associated with data storage and restoration. While carriers and third parties are increasingly taking control of our data, there is very little in the way of ensuring that your data is in good hands. It all comes down to trust, but that simply isn’t enough.

Getting a best practices and standards system could really address this issue but it isn’t easy. We want to know that if we are entrusting our data to a company, that they can be relied on to restore said data. When the Microsoft Danger servers that were charged with restoring Sidekick data failed, we found out there was no backup system in place and that the data resided on the cloud, with little ability to be restored. We could have avoided this with more transparency.

We want IT professionals to get together and understand what their back up and restore capabilities are. Do they test their processes internally? Can we see the results?

Now, some will take the opinion “if it’s important, you should never trust anyone else to hold it for you.” This is a solid argument but it’s not conducive to growing the industry. Consumers and enterprise should both be able to trust their service providers to hold data for them without having to have a redundant storage process. It’s this trust that is going to propel the smartphone industry forward, but service providers need to earn that trust.

So I put the question to you: Do you trust third parties to be able to restore your data? What proof do you have that they deserve this trust?

Why RIM will not suffer the same fate as Canadian giant Nortel

Comments

nortel_broken

RIM is for many both a great smartphone manufacturer and a source of patriotism. It’s a leader in the ITC (Information and Communications Technology) sector and their executives, especially Jim Balsillie, are quick to point out that it’s a Canadian firm.

This brief description may remind you of another Canadian firm: Nortel. Nortel was also a source of Canadian pride as a prominent, high-technology firm based in Canada.

Both companies, due to their size and influence, have a notable impact on the Toronto Stock Exchange. While RIM occupies about 3% of the TSX, Nortel once accounted for more than one-third of the main TSX index.

Although there are a few similarities in the two companies, they are completely different and it’s safe to say that RIM will not suffer the same fate as Nortel.

Management at Nortel was infamous for receiving millions in incentives that promoted unethical business practices. In 2004, several of its top executives – including former CEO Frank Dunn – were accused of cooking the books to inflate profit numbers, resulting in millions of dollars of bonuses to these individuals. Last year, criminal charges were laid against Dunn and others.

Jim Balsillie got in trouble with the the OSC which alleged the executives backdated and repriced stock options using dates on which the market price of RIM’s shares was relatively low. Handing out options at the lower prices had the effect of improperly enriching the recipients and, the OSC alleged, could have deprived RIM of about C$66 million.

While both companies seem to be involved in some shady practices, they can’t really be compared because they are on completely different scales. The result of the Nortel scandal resulted in billions in losses for shareholders. The result of the RIM and OSC case was that Balsillie paid a penalty of C$5 million ($4.1 million), while Co-Chief Executive Mike Lazaridis paid a C$1.5 million penalty. The two also paid investigation costs to the regulator.

According to Kevin Restivo, a communications technology analyst at IDC Canada, “RIM and Nortel are very different companies,” he said. “Other than the fact that they’re both based in Canada and both publicly traded companies in the ICT sector … the companies’ histories and similarities separate pretty quickly.”

Some point to competition in the telecom industry, coupled with the crippling accounting scandal, resulted in Nortel’s eventual demise. The telecom industry began to see a large number of mergers such as Alcatel-Lucent and Nokia Siemens Networks, which left Nortel at a disadvantage. With the accounting scandal at hand, the company was in no condition to recover and eventually had to be protected from bankruptcy and sold off.

It’s competition that is also the popular topic when discussing the future of RIM. The difference is that competition will actually make RIM stronger in the end. Sure, market share in North America is fluctuating given sales of the iPhone, but can anyone prove that Apple sales have a negative impact on RIM’s growth? The App Store led an evolution in the market that RIM is still generating considerable profits from, having followed the trend with App World. Competition is also increasing the overall number of smartphone users, and this trend is helping to increase sales for RIM. Other smartphone manufacturers may represent competition, but for some reason the Palm Pre is often cited. Remember, Palm only sold 810,000 units last quarter compared to 8.9 million devices for RIM.

So while these two companies represent the talent that Canada possesses in the ICT world, they will have two very different fates.

[Via]

BlackBerry Operating Rules in the Canadian Government

Comments

blackberry_in_government

Alastair Sweeny is a Canadian publisher, historian and author. He is best known in the BlackBerry industry for publishing his book BlackBerry Planet: The Story of Research in Motion and the Little Device that Took the World by Storm.

From a published excerpt, we get some insight into how BlackBerry shapes some government institutions. From the excerpt:

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, is a political town, chock-full of BlackBerry addicts. Overall, the city shares with Washington, D.C., a kind of frantic machismo about using the device. Prime Minister Stephen Harper does not use a BlackBerry, but his staffers and most other politicians on Parliament Hill are dependent. All members of Parliament (MPs) and their staffs are given four BlackBerrys by the office of the Speaker of the House.

Former Liberal MP and financial author Garth Turner is a self-confessed connection junkie, who sleeps with his BlackBerry next to his bed. Turner particularly hates long flights when his precious device no longer works. “Travelling is hard enough,” he says, “but travelling without your BlackBerry vibrating reassuringly on your hip is absolute digital hell.”

Durham MP Mark Holland says he felt “phantom vibrations” when away from his device for three days, and notes that there is a BlackBerry-driven “subconversation” going on all the time in committee and in the House. There is also an “emergent BlackBerry etiquette,” where it’s okay to use the device, even at a dinner, when everybody else is also tapping away, but it’s important to be aware if there are any-non addicts in the room who might be insulted.

But there are islands of sanity on Parliament Hill. All parties ask their MPs to check their BlackBerrys at the door of caucus meetings, and the Liberal party caucus even went so far as to pass a rule banning them outright. You can also find a few people off the Hill with some decent perspective on RIM’s invention and how it ought to be used.

Dick Fadden is former deputy minister of Citizenship and Immigration in the government of Canada. (In June, 2009, he was appointed head of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service). Fadden became a hero to his department and to scores of government employees when in January 2008 he banned BlackBerry use for business from seven o’clock at night and on weekends. Well, not exactly banned. Fadden called the new policy “operating rules,” designed to help “attack some of the stresses around work”:

- BlackBerry blackout between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. and on weekends and holidays;

- Meetings should not be held during the lunch hour;

- BlackBerrys should not be used during meetings;

- Meetings should start and finish on time as a means of managing workloads.

I visited Fadden a year after the famous memo and asked him whether the policy had any effect. Right away he said, “Look, we consider the BlackBerry has great value in the department. It’s a useful tool and boosts productivity. But it has to be managed.”

I asked him whether he had done any analysis of the BlackBerry blackout. He said he brought it up regularly with his managers and found “the main result was a major drop in the amount of e-mail delivered in the department. Although it is creeping up again.”

How did Fadden manage his own personal use as a senior public servant? He said he never uses e-mail on his BlackBerry, but only PINs or sends messages for security. E-mail stays on his PC. He turns his off at 11 at night, but of course he still has to be available for emergencies by phone 24/7.

Fadden says public reaction was mixed to his policy. Some newspaper letter writers said he should “get a life” or “join the 21st Century.” One senior manager sniffed that the BlackBerry blackout was “a stupid decision that pretends to deal with the real issue of workload and stress. So would we have banned telephones on bureaucrats’ desks at the turn of the century?”

But overall the policy struck a nerve.

People in Fadden’s department were clearly suffering under the onslaught of e-mail and the expectation of being always on. They knew they needed to manage their addiction and attack their BlackBerry abuse. One employee told CTV News, “We’re feeling the pressure trying to get a lot of stuff done in a short period of time and the fact that they’re recognizing our families are suffering the consequences of it, I think it’s a great idea.”

I asked Fadden why these kinds of operating rules were not more popular and why they weren’t government policy across the board. He said other departments were bringing in similar guidelines to a greater or lesser extent, but that it was not something that should be imposed from above. Policies had to be tailored to each department, and managers had to be convinced they were useful in their particular cases.

Fadden acknowledged his measures might seem a “bit artificial” to some. Obviously you had to be flexible and recognize that some meetings had to go on longer or you had to keep your BlackBerry on at critical times. But finding ways to respect the needs of employees to balance their work and life was worth it. And the very fact of having a policy — not a ban — still makes people aware of the dangers and time-wasting if they don’t respect others in the amount of e-mail they send.

Linda Duxbury, a professor at Carleton University’s Sprott School of Business in Ottawa, hailed Fadden’s move as “visionary” since, in her opinion, many people in the public service were too “wired” to do their jobs efficiently and productively. “Good for him, it’s the kind of leadership the public service needs, and this is leadership because he’s doing something that is not easy. The whole public service revolves around the BlackBerry and being available 24/7 and he’s the first to go beyond talking about balance.”

RIM Widget SDK does not support camera or native mapping

Comments

blackberry-widgets-300x307

Rhomobile make open source development software that allows a developer to build great native software with more familiar code. The company recently wrote about the launch of RIM’s Widget SDK on their blog, and it points out the fact that web development for mobile is a trend in the industry.

From their blog: “The good news for us is that RIM’s announcement is just part of a much larger trend. Nokia also does this with their Web Runtime toolkit. iPhone developers have many options to use web skills for rich native apps: either our Rhodes framework or frameworks such as PhoneGap, Corona, Titanium or Nimblekit. Android developers can write native apps with HTML using Rhodes, PhoneGap, Corona or Titanium. With third party JavaScript libraries such as JQTouch for iPhone and Android (which we highly recommend and use often in combination with Rhodes apps) such apps can have all the animated pop and dazzle of something you might write in Objective C. Without the pain of throwing away 25 years of progress in more advanced programming languages.

To take a closer look at what RIM has delivered it does appear that it’s still a subset of what we offer with no camera support and no native mapping. The big difference however is that we’re the only framework available for all smartphones and the only framework that provides synchronization (an easy way to enable current information to be available locally on user’s devices even when they are offline). I’m excited about seeing BlackBerry developers use the Widget SDK to learn “web-based for native” and then be that much more ready to use our framework on other devices and to upgrade what they’ve done for BlackBerries to be true enterprise apps, complete with synchronized data.”

Interesting that Rhomobile points out the SDK has no camera or native mapping support. While the camera and maps are not all that common in a basic app, it is still very limiting to not offer the services for developers. Have any developers out there began delving into the Widget SDK to confirm?

AddOnis All in One BlackBerry utility now on sale

Comments

blackberrycool_deals

AddOnis is an all-in-one utility pack for your BlackBerry and it’s today’s Deal of the Day.

Upon installation, AddOnis imbues your BlackBerry with a wide variety of features that are normally packed into multiple utilities. This software extends the system functionality, enabling features missing from the system that make your device easier and more efficient to use by adding all of the choices you always wanted to your menu selections.

Click the purchase link to view the full feature set on the download page.

AddOnis : “The” All-In-One utility for your BlackBerry! Retail price $9.95 and today it’s 40% off, making it $5.97, a savings of $3.98!!




Bad Behavior has blocked 27933 access attempts in the last 7 days.