<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-440314</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-440314</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll agree with Mark here. You can&#039;t get those kinds of speeds from EDGE - you should probably update this post to reflect that - it&#039;s pretty misleading. There&#039;s a reason why the website won&#039;t let you use your Blackberry browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree with Mark here. You can&#8217;t get those kinds of speeds from EDGE &#8211; you should probably update this post to reflect that &#8211; it&#8217;s pretty misleading. There&#8217;s a reason why the website won&#8217;t let you use your Blackberry browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507780</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507780</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll agree with Mark here. You can&#039;t get those kinds of speeds from EDGE - you should probably update this post to reflect that - it&#039;s pretty misleading. There&#039;s a reason why the website won&#039;t let you use your Blackberry browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree with Mark here. You can&#8217;t get those kinds of speeds from EDGE &#8211; you should probably update this post to reflect that &#8211; it&#8217;s pretty misleading. There&#8217;s a reason why the website won&#8217;t let you use your Blackberry browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507781</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507781</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll agree with Mark here. You can&#039;t get those kinds of speeds from EDGE - you should probably update this post to reflect that - it&#039;s pretty misleading. There&#039;s a reason why the website won&#039;t let you use your Blackberry browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll agree with Mark here. You can&#8217;t get those kinds of speeds from EDGE &#8211; you should probably update this post to reflect that &#8211; it&#8217;s pretty misleading. There&#8217;s a reason why the website won&#8217;t let you use your Blackberry browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vito</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-440255</link>
		<dc:creator>Vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-440255</guid>
		<description>I second Mark&#039;s comment.

Didn&#039;t it cross your mind that the results are EXTREMELY fast on all connection types?  

It is IMPOSSIBLE for Edge (2G) or even the Bold&#039;s 3G (which is only 3.2Mbit) to download a 1MB file that fast.  I would say it&#039;s even impossible wifi as I&#039;ve never seem my 9700 download anything that fast.

Basically your tests are flawed.  The issue is likely that your browser is caching the data and not actually re-downlaading it each time.  The discrepancies in the test results are due to the time it takes each connection type to hit the web page and confirm the info (much less than 1MB).

Download the Xtremelabs app and try again.

Actually, since I&#039;m up anyway, I ran some tests myself.  I ran each test a few times and averaged the results.  There were no large discrepancies when re-running the test on the same connection type so I did throw out the best and worst times (also, I&#039;m holding a 4mo old and I can&#039;t be bothered to run the tests more than I already have).

Results:
     
2G     250kbps  (32 seconds)
3G     2200kbps  (3.7 seconds)
WiFi   722kbps  (11 seconds)

Now, I&#039;m looking at the numbers above and I&#039;m thinking - wtf is up with wifi? It&#039;s not my internet connecting which is 13Mb. On a hunch, I turned of Bluetooth and sure enough, the speeds doubled!  With Bluetooth turned off I was getting ~1690kbps down, so more than twice as fast (~5 seconds for a 1MB file).  Anyway, those speeds are still not the best - I think it&#039;s likely due to my encryption/wifi router compatibility.

I re-tested 3G as well and it went up another 1000kbps to 3200kbps (2.5 seconds).

Lastly, upload speeds sucks on both 2G and 3G from my house - my couch more specifically.  Both 2G and 3G were around 40kbps - so that would take about 3min 20 seconds to upload 1MB.

In a reversal of the download speeds, WiFi uploads speeds came out on top with 900kbps (10 seconds for 1MB).

Happy Sunday.

-V</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Mark&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t it cross your mind that the results are EXTREMELY fast on all connection types?  </p>
<p>It is IMPOSSIBLE for Edge (2G) or even the Bold&#8217;s 3G (which is only 3.2Mbit) to download a 1MB file that fast.  I would say it&#8217;s even impossible wifi as I&#8217;ve never seem my 9700 download anything that fast.</p>
<p>Basically your tests are flawed.  The issue is likely that your browser is caching the data and not actually re-downlaading it each time.  The discrepancies in the test results are due to the time it takes each connection type to hit the web page and confirm the info (much less than 1MB).</p>
<p>Download the Xtremelabs app and try again.</p>
<p>Actually, since I&#8217;m up anyway, I ran some tests myself.  I ran each test a few times and averaged the results.  There were no large discrepancies when re-running the test on the same connection type so I did throw out the best and worst times (also, I&#8217;m holding a 4mo old and I can&#8217;t be bothered to run the tests more than I already have).</p>
<p>Results:</p>
<p>2G     250kbps  (32 seconds)<br />
3G     2200kbps  (3.7 seconds)<br />
WiFi   722kbps  (11 seconds)</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m looking at the numbers above and I&#8217;m thinking &#8211; wtf is up with wifi? It&#8217;s not my internet connecting which is 13Mb. On a hunch, I turned of Bluetooth and sure enough, the speeds doubled!  With Bluetooth turned off I was getting ~1690kbps down, so more than twice as fast (~5 seconds for a 1MB file).  Anyway, those speeds are still not the best &#8211; I think it&#8217;s likely due to my encryption/wifi router compatibility.</p>
<p>I re-tested 3G as well and it went up another 1000kbps to 3200kbps (2.5 seconds).</p>
<p>Lastly, upload speeds sucks on both 2G and 3G from my house &#8211; my couch more specifically.  Both 2G and 3G were around 40kbps &#8211; so that would take about 3min 20 seconds to upload 1MB.</p>
<p>In a reversal of the download speeds, WiFi uploads speeds came out on top with 900kbps (10 seconds for 1MB).</p>
<p>Happy Sunday.</p>
<p>-V</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vito</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507779</link>
		<dc:creator>Vito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507779</guid>
		<description>I second Mark&#039;s comment.

Didn&#039;t it cross your mind that the results are EXTREMELY fast on all connection types?  

It is IMPOSSIBLE for Edge (2G) or even the Bold&#039;s 3G (which is only 3.2Mbit) to download a 1MB file that fast.  I would say it&#039;s even impossible wifi as I&#039;ve never seem my 9700 download anything that fast.

Basically your tests are flawed.  The issue is likely that your browser is caching the data and not actually re-downlaading it each time.  The discrepancies in the test results are due to the time it takes each connection type to hit the web page and confirm the info (much less than 1MB).

Download the Xtremelabs app and try again.

Actually, since I&#039;m up anyway, I ran some tests myself.  I ran each test a few times and averaged the results.  There were no large discrepancies when re-running the test on the same connection type so I did throw out the best and worst times (also, I&#039;m holding a 4mo old and I can&#039;t be bothered to run the tests more than I already have).

Results:
     
2G     250kbps  (32 seconds)
3G     2200kbps  (3.7 seconds)
WiFi   722kbps  (11 seconds)

Now, I&#039;m looking at the numbers above and I&#039;m thinking - wtf is up with wifi? It&#039;s not my internet connecting which is 13Mb. On a hunch, I turned of Bluetooth and sure enough, the speeds doubled!  With Bluetooth turned off I was getting ~1690kbps down, so more than twice as fast (~5 seconds for a 1MB file).  Anyway, those speeds are still not the best - I think it&#039;s likely due to my encryption/wifi router compatibility.

I re-tested 3G as well and it went up another 1000kbps to 3200kbps (2.5 seconds).

Lastly, upload speeds sucks on both 2G and 3G from my house - my couch more specifically.  Both 2G and 3G were around 40kbps - so that would take about 3min 20 seconds to upload 1MB.

In a reversal of the download speeds, WiFi uploads speeds came out on top with 900kbps (10 seconds for 1MB).

Happy Sunday.

-V</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Mark&#8217;s comment.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t it cross your mind that the results are EXTREMELY fast on all connection types?  </p>
<p>It is IMPOSSIBLE for Edge (2G) or even the Bold&#8217;s 3G (which is only 3.2Mbit) to download a 1MB file that fast.  I would say it&#8217;s even impossible wifi as I&#8217;ve never seem my 9700 download anything that fast.</p>
<p>Basically your tests are flawed.  The issue is likely that your browser is caching the data and not actually re-downlaading it each time.  The discrepancies in the test results are due to the time it takes each connection type to hit the web page and confirm the info (much less than 1MB).</p>
<p>Download the Xtremelabs app and try again.</p>
<p>Actually, since I&#8217;m up anyway, I ran some tests myself.  I ran each test a few times and averaged the results.  There were no large discrepancies when re-running the test on the same connection type so I did throw out the best and worst times (also, I&#8217;m holding a 4mo old and I can&#8217;t be bothered to run the tests more than I already have).</p>
<p>Results:</p>
<p>2G     250kbps  (32 seconds)<br />
3G     2200kbps  (3.7 seconds)<br />
WiFi   722kbps  (11 seconds)</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m looking at the numbers above and I&#8217;m thinking &#8211; wtf is up with wifi? It&#8217;s not my internet connecting which is 13Mb. On a hunch, I turned of Bluetooth and sure enough, the speeds doubled!  With Bluetooth turned off I was getting ~1690kbps down, so more than twice as fast (~5 seconds for a 1MB file).  Anyway, those speeds are still not the best &#8211; I think it&#8217;s likely due to my encryption/wifi router compatibility.</p>
<p>I re-tested 3G as well and it went up another 1000kbps to 3200kbps (2.5 seconds).</p>
<p>Lastly, upload speeds sucks on both 2G and 3G from my house &#8211; my couch more specifically.  Both 2G and 3G were around 40kbps &#8211; so that would take about 3min 20 seconds to upload 1MB.</p>
<p>In a reversal of the download speeds, WiFi uploads speeds came out on top with 900kbps (10 seconds for 1MB).</p>
<p>Happy Sunday.</p>
<p>-V</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool roundup for the week of December 7th &#124; Blackberry Software</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-439685</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool roundup for the week of December 7th &#124; Blackberry Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-439685</guid>
		<description>[...] Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-439566</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-439566</guid>
		<description>Maybe you didn&#039;t read the &quot;Why this test doesn&#039;t work on BlackBerry browsers&quot; link. But there is no possible way you downloaded 1 MEGABYTE in 2.42 seconds using EDGE (which is 2.5 or 2.75G, 2G = GPRS).

EDGE has a theoretical max speed of 473.6 kilobits (not bytes) per second. Which is 60 KB/s which means that at maximum speed it would take 17 seconds for EDGE to download 1MB. More realistically you&#039;re probably only going to be getting 1/2 that speed? Maybe less. So it should take more around 40 seconds to 1 minute.

I would suggest the speed test app made by XtremeLabs to get some better results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you didn&#8217;t read the &#8220;Why this test doesn&#8217;t work on BlackBerry browsers&#8221; link. But there is no possible way you downloaded 1 MEGABYTE in 2.42 seconds using EDGE (which is 2.5 or 2.75G, 2G = GPRS).</p>
<p>EDGE has a theoretical max speed of 473.6 kilobits (not bytes) per second. Which is 60 KB/s which means that at maximum speed it would take 17 seconds for EDGE to download 1MB. More realistically you&#8217;re probably only going to be getting 1/2 that speed? Maybe less. So it should take more around 40 seconds to 1 minute.</p>
<p>I would suggest the speed test app made by XtremeLabs to get some better results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507778</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507778</guid>
		<description>Maybe you didn&#039;t read the &quot;Why this test doesn&#039;t work on BlackBerry browsers&quot; link. But there is no possible way you downloaded 1 MEGABYTE in 2.42 seconds using EDGE (which is 2.5 or 2.75G, 2G = GPRS).

EDGE has a theoretical max speed of 473.6 kilobits (not bytes) per second. Which is 60 KB/s which means that at maximum speed it would take 17 seconds for EDGE to download 1MB. More realistically you&#039;re probably only going to be getting 1/2 that speed? Maybe less. So it should take more around 40 seconds to 1 minute.

I would suggest the speed test app made by XtremeLabs to get some better results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you didn&#8217;t read the &#8220;Why this test doesn&#8217;t work on BlackBerry browsers&#8221; link. But there is no possible way you downloaded 1 MEGABYTE in 2.42 seconds using EDGE (which is 2.5 or 2.75G, 2G = GPRS).</p>
<p>EDGE has a theoretical max speed of 473.6 kilobits (not bytes) per second. Which is 60 KB/s which means that at maximum speed it would take 17 seconds for EDGE to download 1MB. More realistically you&#8217;re probably only going to be getting 1/2 that speed? Maybe less. So it should take more around 40 seconds to 1 minute.</p>
<p>I would suggest the speed test app made by XtremeLabs to get some better results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom slee</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-439519</link>
		<dc:creator>tom slee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-439519</guid>
		<description>In addition to the bandwidth, latency is an interesting thing to measure. 

I make that 4708 Kbps for 3G, which is faster than those recorded by Wired Magazine in the US earlier this year: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/3g-speed-test/. Perhaps networks are being upgraded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the bandwidth, latency is an interesting thing to measure. </p>
<p>I make that 4708 Kbps for 3G, which is faster than those recorded by Wired Magazine in the US earlier this year: <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/3g-speed-test/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/3g-speed-test/</a>. Perhaps networks are being upgraded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom slee</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507777</link>
		<dc:creator>tom slee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507777</guid>
		<description>In addition to the bandwidth, latency is an interesting thing to measure. 

I make that 4708 Kbps for 3G, which is faster than those recorded by Wired Magazine in the US earlier this year: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/3g-speed-test/. Perhaps networks are being upgraded?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the bandwidth, latency is an interesting thing to measure. </p>
<p>I make that 4708 Kbps for 3G, which is faster than those recorded by Wired Magazine in the US earlier this year: <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/3g-speed-test/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/3g-speed-test/</a>. Perhaps networks are being upgraded?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasan Alpan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-439484</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasan Alpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-439484</guid>
		<description>This will be very interesting to see, and I can&#039;t wait for all of the results to start coming in.  I ran some similar tests because i was quite disappointed with the overall WiFi performance on my Bold 9000.  I couldn&#039;t quite figure out why the WiFi results were not that much better than 3G results.  Then I did a series of test where I turned the radio off, so only WiFi was active, and got significantly better results!  Try it and see if you get similar results, I would be interested.  Good luck with your testing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be very interesting to see, and I can&#8217;t wait for all of the results to start coming in.  I ran some similar tests because i was quite disappointed with the overall WiFi performance on my Bold 9000.  I couldn&#8217;t quite figure out why the WiFi results were not that much better than 3G results.  Then I did a series of test where I turned the radio off, so only WiFi was active, and got significantly better results!  Try it and see if you get similar results, I would be interested.  Good luck with your testing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasan Alpan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507775</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasan Alpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507775</guid>
		<description>This will be very interesting to see, and I can&#039;t wait for all of the results to start coming in.  I ran some similar tests because i was quite disappointed with the overall WiFi performance on my Bold 9000.  I couldn&#039;t quite figure out why the WiFi results were not that much better than 3G results.  Then I did a series of test where I turned the radio off, so only WiFi was active, and got significantly better results!  Try it and see if you get similar results, I would be interested.  Good luck with your testing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be very interesting to see, and I can&#8217;t wait for all of the results to start coming in.  I ran some similar tests because i was quite disappointed with the overall WiFi performance on my Bold 9000.  I couldn&#8217;t quite figure out why the WiFi results were not that much better than 3G results.  Then I did a series of test where I turned the radio off, so only WiFi was active, and got significantly better results!  Try it and see if you get similar results, I would be interested.  Good luck with your testing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hasan Alpan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507776</link>
		<dc:creator>Hasan Alpan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507776</guid>
		<description>This will be very interesting to see, and I can&#039;t wait for all of the results to start coming in.  I ran some similar tests because i was quite disappointed with the overall WiFi performance on my Bold 9000.  I couldn&#039;t quite figure out why the WiFi results were not that much better than 3G results.  Then I did a series of test where I turned the radio off, so only WiFi was active, and got significantly better results!  Try it and see if you get similar results, I would be interested.  Good luck with your testing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be very interesting to see, and I can&#8217;t wait for all of the results to start coming in.  I ran some similar tests because i was quite disappointed with the overall WiFi performance on my Bold 9000.  I couldn&#8217;t quite figure out why the WiFi results were not that much better than 3G results.  Then I did a series of test where I turned the radio off, so only WiFi was active, and got significantly better results!  Try it and see if you get similar results, I would be interested.  Good luck with your testing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-439462</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-439462</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to be keeping these tests really simple. When others have done these sorts of tests, they get drowned out by the sheer mass of data that they&#039;ve collected (different flavors of 2G and 3G, different locales etc). I would like to keep my results focused on how people really use their BlackBerrys.  1235 kbps vs 1436 kbps has no performance context for me so I&#039;m going to be even more practical for the rest of my testing.

Here&#039;s a preview of the next installment.

Test 2: The email test.  Testing email transmission and reception for emails big and small. Email is priority one for BlackBerry users, determining a winner will mean a lot of test emails and a stopwatch.

I&#039;d love some feedback too.  Let me know if you&#039;ve devised a test that you&#039;d like me to try out!

I&#039;m using OS 4.6 and the 2G and 3G flavors I&#039;m using are GSM based so the 2G is EDGE.  I want to keep this series of tests simple, if you&#039;d like to post your CDMA-based findings I would be thrilled!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be keeping these tests really simple. When others have done these sorts of tests, they get drowned out by the sheer mass of data that they&#8217;ve collected (different flavors of 2G and 3G, different locales etc). I would like to keep my results focused on how people really use their BlackBerrys.  1235 kbps vs 1436 kbps has no performance context for me so I&#8217;m going to be even more practical for the rest of my testing.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a preview of the next installment.</p>
<p>Test 2: The email test.  Testing email transmission and reception for emails big and small. Email is priority one for BlackBerry users, determining a winner will mean a lot of test emails and a stopwatch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love some feedback too.  Let me know if you&#8217;ve devised a test that you&#8217;d like me to try out!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using OS 4.6 and the 2G and 3G flavors I&#8217;m using are GSM based so the 2G is EDGE.  I want to keep this series of tests simple, if you&#8217;d like to post your CDMA-based findings I would be thrilled!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507773</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507773</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to be keeping these tests really simple. When others have done these sorts of tests, they get drowned out by the sheer mass of data that they&#039;ve collected (different flavors of 2G and 3G, different locales etc). I would like to keep my results focused on how people really use their BlackBerrys.  1235 kbps vs 1436 kbps has no performance context for me so I&#039;m going to be even more practical for the rest of my testing.

Here&#039;s a preview of the next installment.

Test 2: The email test.  Testing email transmission and reception for emails big and small. Email is priority one for BlackBerry users, determining a winner will mean a lot of test emails and a stopwatch.

I&#039;d love some feedback too.  Let me know if you&#039;ve devised a test that you&#039;d like me to try out!

I&#039;m using OS 4.6 and the 2G and 3G flavors I&#039;m using are GSM based so the 2G is EDGE.  I want to keep this series of tests simple, if you&#039;d like to post your CDMA-based findings I would be thrilled!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be keeping these tests really simple. When others have done these sorts of tests, they get drowned out by the sheer mass of data that they&#8217;ve collected (different flavors of 2G and 3G, different locales etc). I would like to keep my results focused on how people really use their BlackBerrys.  1235 kbps vs 1436 kbps has no performance context for me so I&#8217;m going to be even more practical for the rest of my testing.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a preview of the next installment.</p>
<p>Test 2: The email test.  Testing email transmission and reception for emails big and small. Email is priority one for BlackBerry users, determining a winner will mean a lot of test emails and a stopwatch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love some feedback too.  Let me know if you&#8217;ve devised a test that you&#8217;d like me to try out!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using OS 4.6 and the 2G and 3G flavors I&#8217;m using are GSM based so the 2G is EDGE.  I want to keep this series of tests simple, if you&#8217;d like to post your CDMA-based findings I would be thrilled!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Cameron</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507774</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507774</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to be keeping these tests really simple. When others have done these sorts of tests, they get drowned out by the sheer mass of data that they&#039;ve collected (different flavors of 2G and 3G, different locales etc). I would like to keep my results focused on how people really use their BlackBerrys.  1235 kbps vs 1436 kbps has no performance context for me so I&#039;m going to be even more practical for the rest of my testing.

Here&#039;s a preview of the next installment.

Test 2: The email test.  Testing email transmission and reception for emails big and small. Email is priority one for BlackBerry users, determining a winner will mean a lot of test emails and a stopwatch.

I&#039;d love some feedback too.  Let me know if you&#039;ve devised a test that you&#039;d like me to try out!

I&#039;m using OS 4.6 and the 2G and 3G flavors I&#039;m using are GSM based so the 2G is EDGE.  I want to keep this series of tests simple, if you&#039;d like to post your CDMA-based findings I would be thrilled!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be keeping these tests really simple. When others have done these sorts of tests, they get drowned out by the sheer mass of data that they&#8217;ve collected (different flavors of 2G and 3G, different locales etc). I would like to keep my results focused on how people really use their BlackBerrys.  1235 kbps vs 1436 kbps has no performance context for me so I&#8217;m going to be even more practical for the rest of my testing.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a preview of the next installment.</p>
<p>Test 2: The email test.  Testing email transmission and reception for emails big and small. Email is priority one for BlackBerry users, determining a winner will mean a lot of test emails and a stopwatch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love some feedback too.  Let me know if you&#8217;ve devised a test that you&#8217;d like me to try out!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using OS 4.6 and the 2G and 3G flavors I&#8217;m using are GSM based so the 2G is EDGE.  I want to keep this series of tests simple, if you&#8217;d like to post your CDMA-based findings I would be thrilled!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Kemper</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-439439</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Kemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-439439</guid>
		<description>A better question is how fast can you upload big emails/data?  On wifi using Vayyoo&#039;s enterprise tech i&#039;ve uploaded at speeds of greater than 150kb/s with payloads amounting to more than 150mbs (on a 9000 running 5.0). Another factor key in determining speeds is whether you&#039;re using the carrier apn or the BIS/BES connection.  In my experience the carrier network is far faster.  I recommend all users configure their apn settings in the advanced options screen. 

my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better question is how fast can you upload big emails/data?  On wifi using Vayyoo&#8217;s enterprise tech i&#8217;ve uploaded at speeds of greater than 150kb/s with payloads amounting to more than 150mbs (on a 9000 running 5.0). Another factor key in determining speeds is whether you&#8217;re using the carrier apn or the BIS/BES connection.  In my experience the carrier network is far faster.  I recommend all users configure their apn settings in the advanced options screen. </p>
<p>my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Kemper</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507772</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Kemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-507772</guid>
		<description>A better question is how fast can you upload big emails/data?  On wifi using Vayyoo&#039;s enterprise tech i&#039;ve uploaded at speeds of greater than 150kb/s with payloads amounting to more than 150mbs (on a 9000 running 5.0). Another factor key in determining speeds is whether you&#039;re using the carrier apn or the BIS/BES connection.  In my experience the carrier network is far faster.  I recommend all users configure their apn settings in the advanced options screen. 

my 2 cents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A better question is how fast can you upload big emails/data?  On wifi using Vayyoo&#8217;s enterprise tech i&#8217;ve uploaded at speeds of greater than 150kb/s with payloads amounting to more than 150mbs (on a 9000 running 5.0). Another factor key in determining speeds is whether you&#8217;re using the carrier apn or the BIS/BES connection.  In my experience the carrier network is far faster.  I recommend all users configure their apn settings in the advanced options screen. </p>
<p>my 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool roundup for the week of December 7th at SmartPhoneCool.com</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-439436</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool roundup for the week of December 7th at SmartPhoneCool.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-439436</guid>
		<description>[...] Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000 &#124; Crackberry Addiction</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-439431</link>
		<dc:creator>Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000 &#124; Crackberry Addiction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17099#comment-439431</guid>
		<description>[...] - Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000Research in Motion shares are a safe bet after hearing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Testing the 3G, 2G and WiFi download speeds on the Bold 9000Research in Motion shares are a safe bet after hearing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/11/testing-the-3g-2g-and-wifi-download-speeds-on-the-bold-9000/feed/ ) in 0.55788 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 5:08 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 6:08 pm UTC -->
