<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The OS 5 Boot Test: Storm2 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9700 vs Bold 9000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingding007</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-456183</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingding007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-456183</guid>
		<description>i just tested my bold 9700 with Bell and i hit 2 mins and 5 secs. I have 9 3rd party apps....?!?!?!?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just tested my bold 9700 with Bell and i hit 2 mins and 5 secs. I have 9 3rd party apps&#8230;.?!?!?!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingding007</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507865</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingding007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-507865</guid>
		<description>i just tested my bold 9700 with Bell and i hit 2 mins and 5 secs. I have 9 3rd party apps....?!?!?!?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i just tested my bold 9700 with Bell and i hit 2 mins and 5 secs. I have 9 3rd party apps&#8230;.?!?!?!?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool roundup for the week of December 14th &#124; BlackBerry Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-442863</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool roundup for the week of December 14th &#124; BlackBerry Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-442863</guid>
		<description>[...] Nao Symphony – Play music wirelessly from your BlackBerry over WiFi The OS 5 Boot Test: Storm2 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9700 vs Bold 9000 Rumor: New Business Category Expected from App World in 2010 BlackBerry Tip: Using Autotext Macros [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nao Symphony – Play music wirelessly from your BlackBerry over WiFi The OS 5 Boot Test: Storm2 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9700 vs Bold 9000 Rumor: New Business Category Expected from App World in 2010 BlackBerry Tip: Using Autotext Macros [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Test de reinicio; BlackBerry Storm 9550 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9000 vs Bold 9700</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-442241</link>
		<dc:creator>Test de reinicio; BlackBerry Storm 9550 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9000 vs Bold 9700</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-442241</guid>
		<description>[...] de BlackBerrycool ha escrito hoy una entrada más que interesante. Ha hecho un test de reinicio con cuatro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de BlackBerrycool ha escrito hoy una entrada más que interesante. Ha hecho un test de reinicio con cuatro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-442030</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-442030</guid>
		<description>My Bold2 launches fastest among all of my phones. Perhaps it has the lest applications on it. Just got it yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Bold2 launches fastest among all of my phones. Perhaps it has the lest applications on it. Just got it yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507864</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-507864</guid>
		<description>My Bold2 launches fastest among all of my phones. Perhaps it has the lest applications on it. Just got it yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Bold2 launches fastest among all of my phones. Perhaps it has the lest applications on it. Just got it yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Test de reinicio; BlackBerry Storm 9550 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9000 vs Bold 9700 &#124; LaBlackBerry</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-441889</link>
		<dc:creator>Test de reinicio; BlackBerry Storm 9550 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9000 vs Bold 9700 &#124; LaBlackBerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-441889</guid>
		<description>[...] de reinicio; BlackBerry Storm 9550 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9000 vs Bold 9700   Kyle de BlackBerrycool ha escrito hoy una entrada más que interesante. Ha hecho un test de reinicio con cuatro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] de reinicio; BlackBerry Storm 9550 vs Storm 9530 vs Bold 9000 vs Bold 9700   Kyle de BlackBerrycool ha escrito hoy una entrada más que interesante. Ha hecho un test de reinicio con cuatro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-441846</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-441846</guid>
		<description>I think for the numbers to be even close to considered valid they need to be run on a &quot;clean&quot; device.  No apps, no themes, no nothing but the factory OS.

Oh, and 50.0.328 for the Storm isn&#039;t a &quot;leak&quot;.  It was officially released by Verizon the weekend before the Storm2 launched.  To be fair of course Telus has NOT released it so in that case it&#039;s not an &quot;official&quot; Telus release but it IS official.  You SHOULD benchmark it against the &quot;official&quot; Telus 4.7.0.122.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think for the numbers to be even close to considered valid they need to be run on a &#8220;clean&#8221; device.  No apps, no themes, no nothing but the factory OS.</p>
<p>Oh, and 50.0.328 for the Storm isn&#8217;t a &#8220;leak&#8221;.  It was officially released by Verizon the weekend before the Storm2 launched.  To be fair of course Telus has NOT released it so in that case it&#8217;s not an &#8220;official&#8221; Telus release but it IS official.  You SHOULD benchmark it against the &#8220;official&#8221; Telus 4.7.0.122.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507861</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-507861</guid>
		<description>I think for the numbers to be even close to considered valid they need to be run on a &quot;clean&quot; device.  No apps, no themes, no nothing but the factory OS.

Oh, and 50.0.328 for the Storm isn&#039;t a &quot;leak&quot;.  It was officially released by Verizon the weekend before the Storm2 launched.  To be fair of course Telus has NOT released it so in that case it&#039;s not an &quot;official&quot; Telus release but it IS official.  You SHOULD benchmark it against the &quot;official&quot; Telus 4.7.0.122.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think for the numbers to be even close to considered valid they need to be run on a &#8220;clean&#8221; device.  No apps, no themes, no nothing but the factory OS.</p>
<p>Oh, and 50.0.328 for the Storm isn&#8217;t a &#8220;leak&#8221;.  It was officially released by Verizon the weekend before the Storm2 launched.  To be fair of course Telus has NOT released it so in that case it&#8217;s not an &#8220;official&#8221; Telus release but it IS official.  You SHOULD benchmark it against the &#8220;official&#8221; Telus 4.7.0.122.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507862</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-507862</guid>
		<description>I think for the numbers to be even close to considered valid they need to be run on a &quot;clean&quot; device.  No apps, no themes, no nothing but the factory OS.

Oh, and 50.0.328 for the Storm isn&#039;t a &quot;leak&quot;.  It was officially released by Verizon the weekend before the Storm2 launched.  To be fair of course Telus has NOT released it so in that case it&#039;s not an &quot;official&quot; Telus release but it IS official.  You SHOULD benchmark it against the &quot;official&quot; Telus 4.7.0.122.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think for the numbers to be even close to considered valid they need to be run on a &#8220;clean&#8221; device.  No apps, no themes, no nothing but the factory OS.</p>
<p>Oh, and 50.0.328 for the Storm isn&#8217;t a &#8220;leak&#8221;.  It was officially released by Verizon the weekend before the Storm2 launched.  To be fair of course Telus has NOT released it so in that case it&#8217;s not an &#8220;official&#8221; Telus release but it IS official.  You SHOULD benchmark it against the &#8220;official&#8221; Telus 4.7.0.122.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507863</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-507863</guid>
		<description>I think for the numbers to be even close to considered valid they need to be run on a &quot;clean&quot; device.  No apps, no themes, no nothing but the factory OS.

Oh, and 50.0.328 for the Storm isn&#039;t a &quot;leak&quot;.  It was officially released by Verizon the weekend before the Storm2 launched.  To be fair of course Telus has NOT released it so in that case it&#039;s not an &quot;official&quot; Telus release but it IS official.  You SHOULD benchmark it against the &quot;official&quot; Telus 4.7.0.122.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think for the numbers to be even close to considered valid they need to be run on a &#8220;clean&#8221; device.  No apps, no themes, no nothing but the factory OS.</p>
<p>Oh, and 50.0.328 for the Storm isn&#8217;t a &#8220;leak&#8221;.  It was officially released by Verizon the weekend before the Storm2 launched.  To be fair of course Telus has NOT released it so in that case it&#8217;s not an &#8220;official&#8221; Telus release but it IS official.  You SHOULD benchmark it against the &#8220;official&#8221; Telus 4.7.0.122.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qui est le plus rapide?! [Boot de l&#8217;appareil] &#124; BB-FR mobi Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-441833</link>
		<dc:creator>Qui est le plus rapide?! [Boot de l&#8217;appareil] &#124; BB-FR mobi Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-441833</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: BlackberryCool [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: BlackberryCool [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackberry Cool Tests Bold 9700 and Bold 9000 OS 5.0 Boot Test</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-441809</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackberry Cool Tests Bold 9700 and Bold 9000 OS 5.0 Boot Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-441809</guid>
		<description>[...] Youtube Video &amp; Post Here.. AKPC_IDS += &quot;96,&quot;;Popularity: unranked [?]      Posted in Uncategorized [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Youtube Video &amp; Post Here.. AKPC_IDS += &quot;96,&quot;;Popularity: unranked [?]      Posted in Uncategorized [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-441740</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-441740</guid>
		<description>Also, I put loaded in quotes because we&#039;re only talking about 5 apps for each device. The 9700 has 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I put loaded in quotes because we&#8217;re only talking about 5 apps for each device. The 9700 has 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507860</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-507860</guid>
		<description>Also, I put loaded in quotes because we&#039;re only talking about 5 apps for each device. The 9700 has 8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I put loaded in quotes because we&#8217;re only talking about 5 apps for each device. The 9700 has 8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-441739</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-441739</guid>
		<description>@Shaun C - I&#039;d say they&#039;re all equally &quot;loaded&quot; with apps. The 9700 may have a couple more than the others, which might explain why it takes over 5 minutes, but relative to the other devices, I don&#039;t think it could explain such a long wait time. I could redo the test with each device totally clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shaun C &#8211; I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re all equally &#8220;loaded&#8221; with apps. The 9700 may have a couple more than the others, which might explain why it takes over 5 minutes, but relative to the other devices, I don&#8217;t think it could explain such a long wait time. I could redo the test with each device totally clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507859</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-507859</guid>
		<description>@Shaun C - I&#039;d say they&#039;re all equally &quot;loaded&quot; with apps. The 9700 may have a couple more than the others, which might explain why it takes over 5 minutes, but relative to the other devices, I don&#039;t think it could explain such a long wait time. I could redo the test with each device totally clean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shaun C &#8211; I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re all equally &#8220;loaded&#8221; with apps. The 9700 may have a couple more than the others, which might explain why it takes over 5 minutes, but relative to the other devices, I don&#8217;t think it could explain such a long wait time. I could redo the test with each device totally clean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun C.</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-441710</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-441710</guid>
		<description>Are these fresh installs or are they devices loaded with various 3rd party apps? Knowing that, certainly impacts the validity of this test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these fresh installs or are they devices loaded with various 3rd party apps? Knowing that, certainly impacts the validity of this test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun C.</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-507858</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-507858</guid>
		<description>Are these fresh installs or are they devices loaded with various 3rd party apps? Knowing that, certainly impacts the validity of this test.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are these fresh installs or are they devices loaded with various 3rd party apps? Knowing that, certainly impacts the validity of this test.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/comment-page-1/#comment-441691</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17167#comment-441691</guid>
		<description>meanwhile my VZW Tour - even brand new - takes about 7 minutes to boot..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>meanwhile my VZW Tour &#8211; even brand new &#8211; takes about 7 minutes to boot..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.blackberrycool.com/2009/12/15/the-os-5-boot-test-storm2-vs-storm-9530-vs-bold-9700-vs-bold-9000/feed/ ) in 0.55866 seconds, on Feb 11th, 2012 at 6:06 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 11th, 2012 at 7:06 pm UTC -->
