<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VeriSign Confirms Chinese Government Behind Google Attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool Roundup for the Week of January 11th &#124; blackberry phone reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-523171</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool Roundup for the Week of January 11th &#124; blackberry phone reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-523171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] BlackBerry Outage on January 17th at 2AM Kodak Sues Apple and RIM Over Image Previewing Patents VeriSign Confirms Chinese Government Behind Google Attack New RIM Patent Aims To Speed Up Your Internet Connection T-Mobile Waiving International Long [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BlackBerry Outage on January 17th at 2AM Kodak Sues Apple and RIM Over Image Previewing Patents VeriSign Confirms Chinese Government Behind Google Attack New RIM Patent Aims To Speed Up Your Internet Connection T-Mobile Waiving International Long [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Install This IE Patch NOW! REALLY! &#124; ACT Smart Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-458309</link>
		<dc:creator>Install This IE Patch NOW! REALLY! &#124; ACT Smart Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-458309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] VeriSign Confirms Chinese government Behind Google Attack http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VeriSign Confirms Chinese government Behind Google Attack <a href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chen bin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-455528</link>
		<dc:creator>chen bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-455528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liu Lun, What the fxxk are you talk about? Are you an idiot?
Could you do me a favor to show me the exact law google violated?

Every Chinese knows (except you, maybe you are a son/daughter of some corrupt CCP?official and you learn how to lie from your parents in a CCP way), the fact is, the innocent Google is set up by some pervert official in our state owned TV network CCAV. Here is the evidence. http://xblog.alyzq.com/2009/06/29/660896

Almost every Chinese (except you, of course) is in strong support of google, check the below link,
http://bbs.chinaunix.net/forum-46-2.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liu Lun, What the fxxk are you talk about? Are you an idiot?<br />
Could you do me a favor to show me the exact law google violated?</p>
<p>Every Chinese knows (except you, maybe you are a son/daughter of some corrupt CCP?official and you learn how to lie from your parents in a CCP way), the fact is, the innocent Google is set up by some pervert official in our state owned TV network CCAV. Here is the evidence. <a href="http://xblog.alyzq.com/2009/06/29/660896" rel="nofollow">http://xblog.alyzq.com/2009/06/29/660896</a></p>
<p>Almost every Chinese (except you, of course) is in strong support of google, check the below link,<br />
<a href="http://bbs.chinaunix.net/forum-46-2.html" rel="nofollow">http://bbs.chinaunix.net/forum-46-2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chen bin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508479</link>
		<dc:creator>chen bin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liu Lun, What the fxxk are you talk about? Are you an idiot?
Could you do me a favor to show me the exact law google violated?

Every Chinese knows (except you, maybe you are a son/daughter of some corrupt CCP?official and you learn how to lie from your parents in a CCP way), the fact is, the innocent Google is set up by some pervert official in our state owned TV network CCAV. Here is the evidence. http://xblog.alyzq.com/2009/06/29/660896

Almost every Chinese (except you, of course) is in strong support of google, check the below link,
http://bbs.chinaunix.net/forum-46-2.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liu Lun, What the fxxk are you talk about? Are you an idiot?<br />
Could you do me a favor to show me the exact law google violated?</p>
<p>Every Chinese knows (except you, maybe you are a son/daughter of some corrupt CCP?official and you learn how to lie from your parents in a CCP way), the fact is, the innocent Google is set up by some pervert official in our state owned TV network CCAV. Here is the evidence. <a href="http://xblog.alyzq.com/2009/06/29/660896" rel="nofollow">http://xblog.alyzq.com/2009/06/29/660896</a></p>
<p>Almost every Chinese (except you, of course) is in strong support of google, check the below link,<br />
<a href="http://bbs.chinaunix.net/forum-46-2.html" rel="nofollow">http://bbs.chinaunix.net/forum-46-2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wild thoughts &#187; Chinese tango</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-454078</link>
		<dc:creator>Wild thoughts &#187; Chinese tango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-454078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] operate in China in the past 6 months. VeriSign, a company specialized in computer security, traced this attack back to the chinese government. This is the second one, after the one in July 2009 which was [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] operate in China in the past 6 months. VeriSign, a company specialized in computer security, traced this attack back to the chinese government. This is the second one, after the one in July 2009 which was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool Roundup for the Week of January 11th &#124; BlackBerry Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-453705</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool Roundup for the Week of January 11th &#124; BlackBerry Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-453705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] BlackBerry Outage on January 17th at 2AM Kodak Sues Apple and RIM Over Image Previewing Patents VeriSign Confirms Chinese Government Behind Google Attack New RIM Patent Aims To Speed Up Your Internet Connection T-Mobile Waiving International Long [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BlackBerry Outage on January 17th at 2AM Kodak Sues Apple and RIM Over Image Previewing Patents VeriSign Confirms Chinese Government Behind Google Attack New RIM Patent Aims To Speed Up Your Internet Connection T-Mobile Waiving International Long [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle McInnes</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-453512</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-453512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It should be interesting to see how this plays out for Microsoft. Stories like the legal battle over Kai Fu Lee only highlight how important China is for both companies. Now that Google is potentially closing up shop in China, it seems like the perfect time for Microsoft to move in. Or who knows, maybe Google has taught corporate America that you can&#039;t trust the Chinese government, and the risk of losing intellectual property is too great to do business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be interesting to see how this plays out for Microsoft. Stories like the legal battle over Kai Fu Lee only highlight how important China is for both companies. Now that Google is potentially closing up shop in China, it seems like the perfect time for Microsoft to move in. Or who knows, maybe Google has taught corporate America that you can&#8217;t trust the Chinese government, and the risk of losing intellectual property is too great to do business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle McInnes</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508477</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It should be interesting to see how this plays out for Microsoft. Stories like the legal battle over Kai Fu Lee only highlight how important China is for both companies. Now that Google is potentially closing up shop in China, it seems like the perfect time for Microsoft to move in. Or who knows, maybe Google has taught corporate America that you can&#039;t trust the Chinese government, and the risk of losing intellectual property is too great to do business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be interesting to see how this plays out for Microsoft. Stories like the legal battle over Kai Fu Lee only highlight how important China is for both companies. Now that Google is potentially closing up shop in China, it seems like the perfect time for Microsoft to move in. Or who knows, maybe Google has taught corporate America that you can&#8217;t trust the Chinese government, and the risk of losing intellectual property is too great to do business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle McInnes</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508478</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It should be interesting to see how this plays out for Microsoft. Stories like the legal battle over Kai Fu Lee only highlight how important China is for both companies. Now that Google is potentially closing up shop in China, it seems like the perfect time for Microsoft to move in. Or who knows, maybe Google has taught corporate America that you can&#039;t trust the Chinese government, and the risk of losing intellectual property is too great to do business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be interesting to see how this plays out for Microsoft. Stories like the legal battle over Kai Fu Lee only highlight how important China is for both companies. Now that Google is potentially closing up shop in China, it seems like the perfect time for Microsoft to move in. Or who knows, maybe Google has taught corporate America that you can&#8217;t trust the Chinese government, and the risk of losing intellectual property is too great to do business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-453508</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-453508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, the article that was linked to really only cites the conclusions of a report that is apparently not available in its entirety yet, so the evidence that led them to that conclusion is still forthcoming. 

Right now agreeing with the conclusion means trusting VeriSign.

@Liu Lun -
Yes, Google has said they want to uncensor their search engine in China, which is illegal. But to discount entirely the possibility of illegal actions taken by the Chinese government itself against Google is dishonest. Why is it just a cover? What reason do you have to believe this? Why would Google put itself on a course to be kicked out of China unless they had a good reason?

Though this story is still developing, I think three reasons are likely:

1. Doing business in China forces Google to compromise its core values (Don&#039;t be evil.)
2. If this hacking attempt is all it appears to be, and if, as reported in the New York Times, one target was source code, then Google&#039;s core business is also compromised further by doing business in China.
3. The playing field in China has always been slanted against Google, with the government overtly favoring the home-grown and obedient Baidu. (Quite understandable for the government to do this.)

I think the growing importance of #2 caused Google to reexamine #1. #3 is simply a factor that restricts Google&#039;s prospects of ever competing properly with Baidu. That said I do not think Baidu&#039;s success is soley (or even predominately) explained by favorable government attitudes, but it is partly explanatory, and should not be ignored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the article that was linked to really only cites the conclusions of a report that is apparently not available in its entirety yet, so the evidence that led them to that conclusion is still forthcoming. </p>
<p>Right now agreeing with the conclusion means trusting VeriSign.</p>
<p>@Liu Lun -<br />
Yes, Google has said they want to uncensor their search engine in China, which is illegal. But to discount entirely the possibility of illegal actions taken by the Chinese government itself against Google is dishonest. Why is it just a cover? What reason do you have to believe this? Why would Google put itself on a course to be kicked out of China unless they had a good reason?</p>
<p>Though this story is still developing, I think three reasons are likely:</p>
<p>1. Doing business in China forces Google to compromise its core values (Don&#8217;t be evil.)<br />
2. If this hacking attempt is all it appears to be, and if, as reported in the New York Times, one target was source code, then Google&#8217;s core business is also compromised further by doing business in China.<br />
3. The playing field in China has always been slanted against Google, with the government overtly favoring the home-grown and obedient Baidu. (Quite understandable for the government to do this.)</p>
<p>I think the growing importance of #2 caused Google to reexamine #1. #3 is simply a factor that restricts Google&#8217;s prospects of ever competing properly with Baidu. That said I do not think Baidu&#8217;s success is soley (or even predominately) explained by favorable government attitudes, but it is partly explanatory, and should not be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfred</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508476</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, the article that was linked to really only cites the conclusions of a report that is apparently not available in its entirety yet, so the evidence that led them to that conclusion is still forthcoming. 

Right now agreeing with the conclusion means trusting VeriSign.

@Liu Lun -
Yes, Google has said they want to uncensor their search engine in China, which is illegal. But to discount entirely the possibility of illegal actions taken by the Chinese government itself against Google is dishonest. Why is it just a cover? What reason do you have to believe this? Why would Google put itself on a course to be kicked out of China unless they had a good reason?

Though this story is still developing, I think three reasons are likely:

1. Doing business in China forces Google to compromise its core values (Don&#039;t be evil.)
2. If this hacking attempt is all it appears to be, and if, as reported in the New York Times, one target was source code, then Google&#039;s core business is also compromised further by doing business in China.
3. The playing field in China has always been slanted against Google, with the government overtly favoring the home-grown and obedient Baidu. (Quite understandable for the government to do this.)

I think the growing importance of #2 caused Google to reexamine #1. #3 is simply a factor that restricts Google&#039;s prospects of ever competing properly with Baidu. That said I do not think Baidu&#039;s success is soley (or even predominately) explained by favorable government attitudes, but it is partly explanatory, and should not be ignored.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the article that was linked to really only cites the conclusions of a report that is apparently not available in its entirety yet, so the evidence that led them to that conclusion is still forthcoming. </p>
<p>Right now agreeing with the conclusion means trusting VeriSign.</p>
<p>@Liu Lun -<br />
Yes, Google has said they want to uncensor their search engine in China, which is illegal. But to discount entirely the possibility of illegal actions taken by the Chinese government itself against Google is dishonest. Why is it just a cover? What reason do you have to believe this? Why would Google put itself on a course to be kicked out of China unless they had a good reason?</p>
<p>Though this story is still developing, I think three reasons are likely:</p>
<p>1. Doing business in China forces Google to compromise its core values (Don&#8217;t be evil.)<br />
2. If this hacking attempt is all it appears to be, and if, as reported in the New York Times, one target was source code, then Google&#8217;s core business is also compromised further by doing business in China.<br />
3. The playing field in China has always been slanted against Google, with the government overtly favoring the home-grown and obedient Baidu. (Quite understandable for the government to do this.)</p>
<p>I think the growing importance of #2 caused Google to reexamine #1. #3 is simply a factor that restricts Google&#8217;s prospects of ever competing properly with Baidu. That said I do not think Baidu&#8217;s success is soley (or even predominately) explained by favorable government attitudes, but it is partly explanatory, and should not be ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liu Lun</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-453474</link>
		<dc:creator>Liu Lun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-453474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google wants to do illegal things in China, so they have to go out... This has nothing to do with the &quot;hacking&quot; attempts. This is just a cover.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google wants to do illegal things in China, so they have to go out&#8230; This has nothing to do with the &#8220;hacking&#8221; attempts. This is just a cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liu Lun</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508475</link>
		<dc:creator>Liu Lun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google wants to do illegal things in China, so they have to go out... This has nothing to do with the &quot;hacking&quot; attempts. This is just a cover.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google wants to do illegal things in China, so they have to go out&#8230; This has nothing to do with the &#8220;hacking&#8221; attempts. This is just a cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wondering</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-453330</link>
		<dc:creator>Wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-453330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Kyle McInnes May I say  &quot;a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the United state or proxies thereof.&quot;? Show me the details, or it is bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kyle McInnes May I say  &#8220;a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the United state or proxies thereof.&#8221;? Show me the details, or it is bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wondering</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508473</link>
		<dc:creator>Wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Kyle McInnes May I say  &quot;a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the United state or proxies thereof.&quot;? Show me the details, or it is bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kyle McInnes May I say  &#8220;a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the United state or proxies thereof.&#8221;? Show me the details, or it is bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wondering</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508474</link>
		<dc:creator>Wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Kyle McInnes May I say  &quot;a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the United state or proxies thereof.&quot;? Show me the details, or it is bullshit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kyle McInnes May I say  &#8220;a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the United state or proxies thereof.&#8221;? Show me the details, or it is bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle McInnes</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-453244</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-453244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ridiculous - It definitely made links to China. From the report: &quot;The source IPs and drop server of the attack correspond to a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the Chinese state or proxies thereof.&quot; I&#039;ll concede that the &quot;proof&quot; isn&#039;t as concrete as we would like and the report could ultimately be wrong. Getting concrete proof is pretty difficult in these matters. I&#039;ll update and use a term that carries a little less weight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ridiculous &#8211; It definitely made links to China. From the report: &#8220;The source IPs and drop server of the attack correspond to a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the Chinese state or proxies thereof.&#8221; I&#8217;ll concede that the &#8220;proof&#8221; isn&#8217;t as concrete as we would like and the report could ultimately be wrong. Getting concrete proof is pretty difficult in these matters. I&#8217;ll update and use a term that carries a little less weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle McInnes</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508471</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ridiculous - It definitely made links to China. From the report: &quot;The source IPs and drop server of the attack correspond to a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the Chinese state or proxies thereof.&quot; I&#039;ll concede that the &quot;proof&quot; isn&#039;t as concrete as we would like and the report could ultimately be wrong. Getting concrete proof is pretty difficult in these matters. I&#039;ll update and use a term that carries a little less weight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ridiculous &#8211; It definitely made links to China. From the report: &#8220;The source IPs and drop server of the attack correspond to a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the Chinese state or proxies thereof.&#8221; I&#8217;ll concede that the &#8220;proof&#8221; isn&#8217;t as concrete as we would like and the report could ultimately be wrong. Getting concrete proof is pretty difficult in these matters. I&#8217;ll update and use a term that carries a little less weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle McInnes</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-508472</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-508472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Ridiculous - It definitely made links to China. From the report: &quot;The source IPs and drop server of the attack correspond to a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the Chinese state or proxies thereof.&quot; I&#039;ll concede that the &quot;proof&quot; isn&#039;t as concrete as we would like and the report could ultimately be wrong. Getting concrete proof is pretty difficult in these matters. I&#039;ll update and use a term that carries a little less weight.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ridiculous &#8211; It definitely made links to China. From the report: &#8220;The source IPs and drop server of the attack correspond to a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the Chinese state or proxies thereof.&#8221; I&#8217;ll concede that the &#8220;proof&#8221; isn&#8217;t as concrete as we would like and the report could ultimately be wrong. Getting concrete proof is pretty difficult in these matters. I&#8217;ll update and use a term that carries a little less weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/01/14/verisign-confirms-chinese-government-behind-google-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-453232</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17553#comment-453232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ohhh did not see that one coming..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh did not see that one coming..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
