<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GSM Data Comparison: EDGE vs 3G vs WiFi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ducati99987</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-518366</link>
		<dc:creator>Ducati99987</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 10:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-518366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Should i buy a phone on edge or 3g?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Should i buy a phone on edge or 3g?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pau</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-513049</link>
		<dc:creator>Pau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-513049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why is there wifi in BBM? BBM doesnt work with Wifi]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is there wifi in BBM? BBM doesnt work with Wifi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ??????: EDGE vs 3G vs WiFi - ????????</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-465318</link>
		<dc:creator>??????: EDGE vs 3G vs WiFi - ????????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-465318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ?????blackberrycool.com ???????????     ???:  ???Android??? ??BlackBerry?      ??: 3G, EDGE, WiFi, ????  ????: ??????: EDGE vs 3G vs WiFi ????: ????????, ??????????       ?????? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ?????blackberrycool.com ???????????     ???:  ???Android??? ??BlackBerry?      ??: 3G, EDGE, WiFi, ????  ????: ??????: EDGE vs 3G vs WiFi ????: ????????, ??????????       ?????? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadillac Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-464954</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadillac Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-464954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee you guys must have it hard over there, &#039;cause those 3G/3.5G speeds are PATHETIC!

Our primary network theoretically supports 20Mbps, and around 13Mbps in &quot;real world&quot; circumstances - the fastest cellular network in the world (it was even in last year&#039;s Guinness Book of World Records)!

Admittedly, one needs a compatible device to FULLY benefit from such speeds, but because there&#039;s so much bandwidth available, lower-speed devices typically get pretty close to their THEORETICAL maximum speeds (ie. the speeds quoted by the manufacturer that are normally unrealistic in &quot;real world&quot; circumstances)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee you guys must have it hard over there, &#8217;cause those 3G/3.5G speeds are PATHETIC!</p>
<p>Our primary network theoretically supports 20Mbps, and around 13Mbps in &#8220;real world&#8221; circumstances &#8211; the fastest cellular network in the world (it was even in last year&#8217;s Guinness Book of World Records)!</p>
<p>Admittedly, one needs a compatible device to FULLY benefit from such speeds, but because there&#8217;s so much bandwidth available, lower-speed devices typically get pretty close to their THEORETICAL maximum speeds (ie. the speeds quoted by the manufacturer that are normally unrealistic in &#8220;real world&#8221; circumstances)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadillac Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-508968</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadillac Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-508968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee you guys must have it hard over there, &#039;cause those 3G/3.5G speeds are PATHETIC!

Our primary network theoretically supports 20Mbps, and around 13Mbps in &quot;real world&quot; circumstances - the fastest cellular network in the world (it was even in last year&#039;s Guinness Book of World Records)!

Admittedly, one needs a compatible device to FULLY benefit from such speeds, but because there&#039;s so much bandwidth available, lower-speed devices typically get pretty close to their THEORETICAL maximum speeds (ie. the speeds quoted by the manufacturer that are normally unrealistic in &quot;real world&quot; circumstances)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee you guys must have it hard over there, &#8217;cause those 3G/3.5G speeds are PATHETIC!</p>
<p>Our primary network theoretically supports 20Mbps, and around 13Mbps in &#8220;real world&#8221; circumstances &#8211; the fastest cellular network in the world (it was even in last year&#8217;s Guinness Book of World Records)!</p>
<p>Admittedly, one needs a compatible device to FULLY benefit from such speeds, but because there&#8217;s so much bandwidth available, lower-speed devices typically get pretty close to their THEORETICAL maximum speeds (ie. the speeds quoted by the manufacturer that are normally unrealistic in &#8220;real world&#8221; circumstances)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadillac Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-508969</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadillac Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-508969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee you guys must have it hard over there, &#039;cause those 3G/3.5G speeds are PATHETIC!

Our primary network theoretically supports 20Mbps, and around 13Mbps in &quot;real world&quot; circumstances - the fastest cellular network in the world (it was even in last year&#039;s Guinness Book of World Records)!

Admittedly, one needs a compatible device to FULLY benefit from such speeds, but because there&#039;s so much bandwidth available, lower-speed devices typically get pretty close to their THEORETICAL maximum speeds (ie. the speeds quoted by the manufacturer that are normally unrealistic in &quot;real world&quot; circumstances)!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee you guys must have it hard over there, &#8217;cause those 3G/3.5G speeds are PATHETIC!</p>
<p>Our primary network theoretically supports 20Mbps, and around 13Mbps in &#8220;real world&#8221; circumstances &#8211; the fastest cellular network in the world (it was even in last year&#8217;s Guinness Book of World Records)!</p>
<p>Admittedly, one needs a compatible device to FULLY benefit from such speeds, but because there&#8217;s so much bandwidth available, lower-speed devices typically get pretty close to their THEORETICAL maximum speeds (ie. the speeds quoted by the manufacturer that are normally unrealistic in &#8220;real world&#8221; circumstances)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerry Cool Roundup for the Week of February 1st &#124; BlackBerry Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-464858</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerry Cool Roundup for the Week of February 1st &#124; BlackBerry Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 21:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-464858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] GSM Data Comparison: EDGE vs 3G vs WiFi Hot Celebs and Their BlackBerrys: Whitney Port, Beyonce, Katie Pratt etc. What To Expect from BlackBerry OS 6 – WebOS and Java Hybrid? Interviews with Wireless Industry Players by Rove CEO at Untether.TV Nokia 5700 Running BlackBerry OS 4.6.0.305 Miranda Kerr is My Vote for the Face of BlackBerry [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] GSM Data Comparison: EDGE vs 3G vs WiFi Hot Celebs and Their BlackBerrys: Whitney Port, Beyonce, Katie Pratt etc. What To Expect from BlackBerry OS 6 – WebOS and Java Hybrid? Interviews with Wireless Industry Players by Rove CEO at Untether.TV Nokia 5700 Running BlackBerry OS 4.6.0.305 Miranda Kerr is My Vote for the Face of BlackBerry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Kemper</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-462537</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Kemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-462537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post Matt. 

Fascinating results! 

I&#039;ve noticed that, regardless of radio type, browsing is much faster when an APN in configured as the RIM BIS network can have slow transfer rates at times. Using direct TCP (the result of a configured APN) significantly improves speed but, i believe, it&#039;s not as secure. 

I&#039;ve also found 3G is faster when actually transferring &gt;100kb of data. 

For me, Network choice depends on personal requirements.  For large bandwidth requirements 3G and Wifi are the way to go.  Eg. If i&#039;m sending a multimedia email with 5mb&#039;s of attachments 3G can handle this task in about about a minute, wifi, 15 seconds, 2G 5 min+.  

Also if receiving emails with multiple attachments then higher bandwidth results in faster downloads....duh. 

3G also wins the tethering battle...you can&#039;t tether on EDGE. 

@Ryan WIFI is a separate component that when running drains additional battery on top of cellular...not positive though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Matt. </p>
<p>Fascinating results! </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that, regardless of radio type, browsing is much faster when an APN in configured as the RIM BIS network can have slow transfer rates at times. Using direct TCP (the result of a configured APN) significantly improves speed but, i believe, it&#8217;s not as secure. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also found 3G is faster when actually transferring &gt;100kb of data. </p>
<p>For me, Network choice depends on personal requirements.  For large bandwidth requirements 3G and Wifi are the way to go.  Eg. If i&#8217;m sending a multimedia email with 5mb&#8217;s of attachments 3G can handle this task in about about a minute, wifi, 15 seconds, 2G 5 min+.  </p>
<p>Also if receiving emails with multiple attachments then higher bandwidth results in faster downloads&#8230;.duh. </p>
<p>3G also wins the tethering battle&#8230;you can&#8217;t tether on EDGE. </p>
<p>@Ryan WIFI is a separate component that when running drains additional battery on top of cellular&#8230;not positive though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Kemper</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-508967</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Kemper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-508967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post Matt. 

Fascinating results! 

I&#039;ve noticed that, regardless of radio type, browsing is much faster when an APN in configured as the RIM BIS network can have slow transfer rates at times. Using direct TCP (the result of a configured APN) significantly improves speed but, i believe, it&#039;s not as secure. 

I&#039;ve also found 3G is faster when actually transferring &gt;100kb of data. 

For me, Network choice depends on personal requirements.  For large bandwidth requirements 3G and Wifi are the way to go.  Eg. If i&#039;m sending a multimedia email with 5mb&#039;s of attachments 3G can handle this task in about about a minute, wifi, 15 seconds, 2G 5 min+.  

Also if receiving emails with multiple attachments then higher bandwidth results in faster downloads....duh. 

3G also wins the tethering battle...you can&#039;t tether on EDGE. 

@Ryan WIFI is a separate component that when running drains additional battery on top of cellular...not positive though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Matt. </p>
<p>Fascinating results! </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed that, regardless of radio type, browsing is much faster when an APN in configured as the RIM BIS network can have slow transfer rates at times. Using direct TCP (the result of a configured APN) significantly improves speed but, i believe, it&#8217;s not as secure. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also found 3G is faster when actually transferring &gt;100kb of data. </p>
<p>For me, Network choice depends on personal requirements.  For large bandwidth requirements 3G and Wifi are the way to go.  Eg. If i&#8217;m sending a multimedia email with 5mb&#8217;s of attachments 3G can handle this task in about about a minute, wifi, 15 seconds, 2G 5 min+.  </p>
<p>Also if receiving emails with multiple attachments then higher bandwidth results in faster downloads&#8230;.duh. </p>
<p>3G also wins the tethering battle&#8230;you can&#8217;t tether on EDGE. </p>
<p>@Ryan WIFI is a separate component that when running drains additional battery on top of cellular&#8230;not positive though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-462491</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-462491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this, Matt.  I&#039;m glad to see someone is looking at this topic objectively.

Some things to consider:
 - I attended a RIM event once and recall that, &quot;it take 10X the power to transmit data as it does to receive the same amount.&quot;

 - I&#039;m not positive, but I suspect RIM compresses all the data transmitted via the NOC.  BlackBerry&#039;s are quite possible more efficient (less data transmitted/received over-the-air) for the same resource than a non-BlackBerry device.

 - What is your source for for WiFi causing additional battery-drain than cellular?  I think in both cases your distance to the Access Point or Cell Tower will play a role in how much power is consumed to transmit, and how much and frequently you transmit in that mode.  Is a relatively close WiFi AP better for battery-life than a relatively distant EDGE or 3G cell tower?

 - Currently, I&#039;m running my 9700 on EDGE with WiFi and am enjoying the best battery life I have ever seen on a BlackBerry.  I have WiFi at work and home (where I spend a majority of my time), and only turn 3G on when I tether or need the speed and don&#039;t have WiFi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Matt.  I&#8217;m glad to see someone is looking at this topic objectively.</p>
<p>Some things to consider:<br />
 &#8211; I attended a RIM event once and recall that, &#8220;it take 10X the power to transmit data as it does to receive the same amount.&#8221;</p>
<p> &#8211; I&#8217;m not positive, but I suspect RIM compresses all the data transmitted via the NOC.  BlackBerry&#8217;s are quite possible more efficient (less data transmitted/received over-the-air) for the same resource than a non-BlackBerry device.</p>
<p> &#8211; What is your source for for WiFi causing additional battery-drain than cellular?  I think in both cases your distance to the Access Point or Cell Tower will play a role in how much power is consumed to transmit, and how much and frequently you transmit in that mode.  Is a relatively close WiFi AP better for battery-life than a relatively distant EDGE or 3G cell tower?</p>
<p> &#8211; Currently, I&#8217;m running my 9700 on EDGE with WiFi and am enjoying the best battery life I have ever seen on a BlackBerry.  I have WiFi at work and home (where I spend a majority of my time), and only turn 3G on when I tether or need the speed and don&#8217;t have WiFi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-508965</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-508965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this, Matt.  I&#039;m glad to see someone is looking at this topic objectively.

Some things to consider:
 - I attended a RIM event once and recall that, &quot;it take 10X the power to transmit data as it does to receive the same amount.&quot;

 - I&#039;m not positive, but I suspect RIM compresses all the data transmitted via the NOC.  BlackBerry&#039;s are quite possible more efficient (less data transmitted/received over-the-air) for the same resource than a non-BlackBerry device.

 - What is your source for for WiFi causing additional battery-drain than cellular?  I think in both cases your distance to the Access Point or Cell Tower will play a role in how much power is consumed to transmit, and how much and frequently you transmit in that mode.  Is a relatively close WiFi AP better for battery-life than a relatively distant EDGE or 3G cell tower?

 - Currently, I&#039;m running my 9700 on EDGE with WiFi and am enjoying the best battery life I have ever seen on a BlackBerry.  I have WiFi at work and home (where I spend a majority of my time), and only turn 3G on when I tether or need the speed and don&#039;t have WiFi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Matt.  I&#8217;m glad to see someone is looking at this topic objectively.</p>
<p>Some things to consider:<br />
 &#8211; I attended a RIM event once and recall that, &#8220;it take 10X the power to transmit data as it does to receive the same amount.&#8221;</p>
<p> &#8211; I&#8217;m not positive, but I suspect RIM compresses all the data transmitted via the NOC.  BlackBerry&#8217;s are quite possible more efficient (less data transmitted/received over-the-air) for the same resource than a non-BlackBerry device.</p>
<p> &#8211; What is your source for for WiFi causing additional battery-drain than cellular?  I think in both cases your distance to the Access Point or Cell Tower will play a role in how much power is consumed to transmit, and how much and frequently you transmit in that mode.  Is a relatively close WiFi AP better for battery-life than a relatively distant EDGE or 3G cell tower?</p>
<p> &#8211; Currently, I&#8217;m running my 9700 on EDGE with WiFi and am enjoying the best battery life I have ever seen on a BlackBerry.  I have WiFi at work and home (where I spend a majority of my time), and only turn 3G on when I tether or need the speed and don&#8217;t have WiFi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/02/01/gsm-data-comparison-edge-vs-3g-vs-wifi/comment-page-1/#comment-508966</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=17786#comment-508966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this, Matt.  I&#039;m glad to see someone is looking at this topic objectively.

Some things to consider:
 - I attended a RIM event once and recall that, &quot;it take 10X the power to transmit data as it does to receive the same amount.&quot;

 - I&#039;m not positive, but I suspect RIM compresses all the data transmitted via the NOC.  BlackBerry&#039;s are quite possible more efficient (less data transmitted/received over-the-air) for the same resource than a non-BlackBerry device.

 - What is your source for for WiFi causing additional battery-drain than cellular?  I think in both cases your distance to the Access Point or Cell Tower will play a role in how much power is consumed to transmit, and how much and frequently you transmit in that mode.  Is a relatively close WiFi AP better for battery-life than a relatively distant EDGE or 3G cell tower?

 - Currently, I&#039;m running my 9700 on EDGE with WiFi and am enjoying the best battery life I have ever seen on a BlackBerry.  I have WiFi at work and home (where I spend a majority of my time), and only turn 3G on when I tether or need the speed and don&#039;t have WiFi.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this, Matt.  I&#8217;m glad to see someone is looking at this topic objectively.</p>
<p>Some things to consider:<br />
 &#8211; I attended a RIM event once and recall that, &#8220;it take 10X the power to transmit data as it does to receive the same amount.&#8221;</p>
<p> &#8211; I&#8217;m not positive, but I suspect RIM compresses all the data transmitted via the NOC.  BlackBerry&#8217;s are quite possible more efficient (less data transmitted/received over-the-air) for the same resource than a non-BlackBerry device.</p>
<p> &#8211; What is your source for for WiFi causing additional battery-drain than cellular?  I think in both cases your distance to the Access Point or Cell Tower will play a role in how much power is consumed to transmit, and how much and frequently you transmit in that mode.  Is a relatively close WiFi AP better for battery-life than a relatively distant EDGE or 3G cell tower?</p>
<p> &#8211; Currently, I&#8217;m running my 9700 on EDGE with WiFi and am enjoying the best battery life I have ever seen on a BlackBerry.  I have WiFi at work and home (where I spend a majority of my time), and only turn 3G on when I tether or need the speed and don&#8217;t have WiFi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
