<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Leaked Pictures of the BlackBerry Pearl 9100 with T9 and SureType</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/04/10/more-leaked-pictures-of-the-blackberry-pearl-9100-with-t9-and-suretype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/04/10/more-leaked-pictures-of-the-blackberry-pearl-9100-with-t9-and-suretype/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackBerryCool Roundup for the Week of April 12th &#124; BlackBerry Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/04/10/more-leaked-pictures-of-the-blackberry-pearl-9100-with-t9-and-suretype/comment-page-1/#comment-469591</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackBerryCool Roundup for the Week of April 12th &#124; BlackBerry Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 14:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=19301#comment-469591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] More Leaked Pictures of the BlackBerry Pearl 9100 with T9 and SureType BlackBerry has the Lowest Click-Through Rates in Mobile Advertising Rove Announce BlackBerry Alliance Elite Membership [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More Leaked Pictures of the BlackBerry Pearl 9100 with T9 and SureType BlackBerry has the Lowest Click-Through Rates in Mobile Advertising Rove Announce BlackBerry Alliance Elite Membership [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/04/10/more-leaked-pictures-of-the-blackberry-pearl-9100-with-t9-and-suretype/comment-page-1/#comment-470474</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=19301#comment-470474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never been a SureType hater, having carried a 7100i also alongside my Verizon full QWERTY &#039;berries of the time.  I DO think squeezing full WERTY into the Pearl form factor is going to do nothing but increase the number of BlackBerry haters.  People will get all excited about full QWERTY in such a size, only to find out how totally unusable it will be.  I can see the potential appeal of T9, but I went from a T9 phone to a SureType (as did my wife) and if I can type fast with my fat thumbs, anyone can.  SureType is perfect as it is for the form factor (and it works very well on a portrait Storm), don&#039;t mess with it RIM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve never been a SureType hater, having carried a 7100i also alongside my Verizon full QWERTY &#39;berries of the time.  I DO think squeezing full WERTY into the Pearl form factor is going to do nothing but increase the number of BlackBerry haters.  People will get all excited about full QWERTY in such a size, only to find out how totally unusable it will be.  I can see the potential appeal of T9, but I went from a T9 phone to a SureType (as did my wife) and if I can type fast with my fat thumbs, anyone can.  SureType is perfect as it is for the form factor (and it works very well on a portrait Storm), don&#39;t mess with it RIM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caspan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/04/10/more-leaked-pictures-of-the-blackberry-pearl-9100-with-t9-and-suretype/comment-page-1/#comment-470475</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=19301#comment-470475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a full QWERTY person myself and would never go back but if I had to my first BlackBerry was a 7100 so I love the 2 letter per key I found it worked quite well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m a full QWERTY person myself and would never go back but if I had to my first BlackBerry was a 7100 so I love the 2 letter per key I found it worked quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/04/10/more-leaked-pictures-of-the-blackberry-pearl-9100-with-t9-and-suretype/comment-page-1/#comment-469463</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=19301#comment-469463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never been a SureType hater, having carried a 7100i also alongside my Verizon full QWERTY &#039;berries of the time.  I DO think squeezing full WERTY into the Pearl form factor is going to do nothing but increase the number of BlackBerry haters.  People will get all excited about full QWERTY in such a size, only to find out how totally unusable it will be.  I can see the potential appeal of T9, but I went from a T9 phone to a SureType (as did my wife) and if I can type fast with my fat thumbs, anyone can.  SureType is perfect as it is for the form factor (and it works very well on a portrait Storm), don&#039;t mess with it RIM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve never been a SureType hater, having carried a 7100i also alongside my Verizon full QWERTY &#39;berries of the time.  I DO think squeezing full WERTY into the Pearl form factor is going to do nothing but increase the number of BlackBerry haters.  People will get all excited about full QWERTY in such a size, only to find out how totally unusable it will be.  I can see the potential appeal of T9, but I went from a T9 phone to a SureType (as did my wife) and if I can type fast with my fat thumbs, anyone can.  SureType is perfect as it is for the form factor (and it works very well on a portrait Storm), don&#39;t mess with it RIM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caspan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/04/10/more-leaked-pictures-of-the-blackberry-pearl-9100-with-t9-and-suretype/comment-page-1/#comment-469461</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=19301#comment-469461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a full QWERTY person myself and would never go back but if I had to my first BlackBerry was a 7100 so I love the 2 letter per key I found it worked quite well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m a full QWERTY person myself and would never go back but if I had to my first BlackBerry was a 7100 so I love the 2 letter per key I found it worked quite well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/04/10/more-leaked-pictures-of-the-blackberry-pearl-9100-with-t9-and-suretype/comment-page-1/#comment-469440</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 01:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=19301#comment-469440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before I moved on to a full-QWERTY device, I loved my previous-gen Pearl with the SureType keyboard. I&#039;d happily use it again, so that&#039;s what I&#039;d prefer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before I moved on to a full-QWERTY device, I loved my previous-gen Pearl with the SureType keyboard. I&#39;d happily use it again, so that&#39;s what I&#39;d prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
