<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they Underestimate the QNX OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/</link>
	<description>The voice of the BlackBerry community.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doculinux: Documentación, Software Libre y Tecnología &#187; Conociendo QNX, el sistema operativo que mueve el Playbook</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-525816</link>
		<dc:creator>Doculinux: Documentación, Software Libre y Tecnología &#187; Conociendo QNX, el sistema operativo que mueve el Playbook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-525816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] como el Blackberry App World). Si alcanza con éxito estos dos objetivos es muy probable que supere los malos augurios de los analistas y mantenga (o amplíe) su cuota de [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] como el Blackberry App World). Si alcanza con éxito estos dos objetivos es muy probable que supere los malos augurios de los analistas y mantenga (o amplíe) su cuota de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Saunders Joins RIM as VP of Developer Relations and Ecosystem Development &#124; blackberry phone reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-523007</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Saunders Joins RIM as VP of Developer Relations and Ecosystem Development &#124; blackberry phone reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-523007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Check out all these links for some insight into Alec&#8217;s previous thoughts/posts about RIM. Here is a post that comments on something Alec touched on &#8220;Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they.... Another point we bonded with Alec over was the Seesmic story. While everyone in the media took [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check out all these links for some insight into Alec&#8217;s previous thoughts/posts about RIM. Here is a post that comments on something Alec touched on &#8220;Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they&#8230;. Another point we bonded with Alec over was the Seesmic story. While everyone in the media took [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-522934</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-522934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been working with and writing about QNX since 1987 and it&#039;s the best OS in terms of flexibility and stability by far. If RIM fails to see what they have and simply resells QNX I would love to buy it and show Apple a real competitor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working with and writing about QNX since 1987 and it&#8217;s the best OS in terms of flexibility and stability by far. If RIM fails to see what they have and simply resells QNX I would love to buy it and show Apple a real competitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Saunders Joins RIM as VP of Developer Relations and Ecosystem Development &#124; GamersMB</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-521082</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Saunders Joins RIM as VP of Developer Relations and Ecosystem Development &#124; GamersMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 01:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-521082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Here is a post that comments on something Alec touched on &#8220;Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they.... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is a post that comments on something Alec touched on &#8220;Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alec Saunders Joins RIM as VP of Developer Relations and Ecosystem Development &#124; BlackBerry Cool</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-520974</link>
		<dc:creator>Alec Saunders Joins RIM as VP of Developer Relations and Ecosystem Development &#124; BlackBerry Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-520974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Here is a post that comments on something Alec touched on &#8220;Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they.... [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here is a post that comments on something Alec touched on &#8220;Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-519508</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-519508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you in most of what you said. But think about it, if rimm develops on top of Android, which seems obvious from a certain point of view, what would be the control on the value offered?, What would be the difference with hardware manufacturers from asia such as those you mentioned? Honestly, the last movement for RIMM is finding a good buyer interested in mobility, with a lot of cash from their solid business lines and as clueless as they are, i.e. HP!!! You&#039;ll see...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you in most of what you said. But think about it, if rimm develops on top of Android, which seems obvious from a certain point of view, what would be the control on the value offered?, What would be the difference with hardware manufacturers from asia such as those you mentioned? Honestly, the last movement for RIMM is finding a good buyer interested in mobility, with a lot of cash from their solid business lines and as clueless as they are, i.e. HP!!! You&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-519507</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-519507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are clueless my friend...
QNX, which you probably never programmed or use at all is an OS restricted to marginal circles of engineers in need of a real time OS with the reliability of a tank. For that is right, for all the other stuff, i.e. mobility, QNX is nothing like it. A mobile OS should be designed with mobility in mind, tell microsoft, they were taught the lesson the hard way...
QNX is no death star of doom in any way... It is more like a big stone tight to the feet of a drawning company...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are clueless my friend&#8230;<br />
QNX, which you probably never programmed or use at all is an OS restricted to marginal circles of engineers in need of a real time OS with the reliability of a tank. For that is right, for all the other stuff, i.e. mobility, QNX is nothing like it. A mobile OS should be designed with mobility in mind, tell microsoft, they were taught the lesson the hard way&#8230;<br />
QNX is no death star of doom in any way&#8230; It is more like a big stone tight to the feet of a drawning company&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pcplcprogrammer</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-514898</link>
		<dc:creator>Pcplcprogrammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-514898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QNX is the most stable and configurable OS in the world. That&#039;s my opinion anyway. If RIM could deploy it in a similar fashion as Google and HTC has the Android OS (which again in my opinion is several orders of magnitude better than anything else on the market, even the iPhone which Apple simplified much, it&#039;s boring) I moved from a Window Mobile 6.5 HTC Tilt 2 to an Android 2.2 HTC EVO. The new device is light years ahead of the old one. I can&#039;t understand why anyone would choose to design a device with Windows Mobile. It has always been the most pathetic excuse for an OS since it&#039;s inception, and has only improved slightly from the Win CE&#039;s original release to Mobile 6.5 and whatever version CE is on. And Windows Phone. What a joke. I&#039;m a EE who works with devices such as Allen-Bradely&#039;s newest line of industrial touch-screens. AB chose to put Windows CE their the new touch-screens. What a mistake. On the other end of the spectrum I&#039;ve developed extensively in QNX 4 and now I&#039;m beginning to learn QNX 6. I have always wandered why we don&#039;t see QNX on devices such as AB&#039;s touch-screens. I suppose it&#039;s sort of like the old cliché, &quot;You can lead a horse to water, but you can&#039;t make him drink&quot;. QNX is very similar to Linux in that it&#039;s a POSIX based OS, but that&#039;s where the similarity ends. QNX puts tools in the hands of the developer that an uninformed Windows developer would be utterly astounded. QNX comes with all the tools needed to create the exact OS image needed, and with QNX 6 it is the most awesome and complete development suite out there. If a kernel were designed for the HTC EVO for example, allowing QNX to control the critical processes and a virtual machine installed to run most of the GUI, you would have a device another step up from Android. QNX does not crash and it never needs rebooting. If you have an unruly process you can kill it without bringing everything else down. I really believe if RIM is sharp enough to design using the real benefits of QNX and market it properly, they really could have the next best think. And with QNX running on a BB it could be used to do things never dreamed of before. Imagine in 5 to 10 year connecting your BB to the auto navigation system in your car just before a long drive. Then sit back and relax while QNX takes control of your car and drives you to your destination. QNX is that rock solid!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QNX is the most stable and configurable OS in the world. That&#8217;s my opinion anyway. If RIM could deploy it in a similar fashion as Google and HTC has the Android OS (which again in my opinion is several orders of magnitude better than anything else on the market, even the iPhone which Apple simplified much, it&#8217;s boring) I moved from a Window Mobile 6.5 HTC Tilt 2 to an Android 2.2 HTC EVO. The new device is light years ahead of the old one. I can&#8217;t understand why anyone would choose to design a device with Windows Mobile. It has always been the most pathetic excuse for an OS since it&#8217;s inception, and has only improved slightly from the Win CE&#8217;s original release to Mobile 6.5 and whatever version CE is on. And Windows Phone. What a joke. I&#8217;m a EE who works with devices such as Allen-Bradely&#8217;s newest line of industrial touch-screens. AB chose to put Windows CE their the new touch-screens. What a mistake. On the other end of the spectrum I&#8217;ve developed extensively in QNX 4 and now I&#8217;m beginning to learn QNX 6. I have always wandered why we don&#8217;t see QNX on devices such as AB&#8217;s touch-screens. I suppose it&#8217;s sort of like the old cliché, &#8220;You can lead a horse to water, but you can&#8217;t make him drink&#8221;. QNX is very similar to Linux in that it&#8217;s a POSIX based OS, but that&#8217;s where the similarity ends. QNX puts tools in the hands of the developer that an uninformed Windows developer would be utterly astounded. QNX comes with all the tools needed to create the exact OS image needed, and with QNX 6 it is the most awesome and complete development suite out there. If a kernel were designed for the HTC EVO for example, allowing QNX to control the critical processes and a virtual machine installed to run most of the GUI, you would have a device another step up from Android. QNX does not crash and it never needs rebooting. If you have an unruly process you can kill it without bringing everything else down. I really believe if RIM is sharp enough to design using the real benefits of QNX and market it properly, they really could have the next best think. And with QNX running on a BB it could be used to do things never dreamed of before. Imagine in 5 to 10 year connecting your BB to the auto navigation system in your car just before a long drive. Then sit back and relax while QNX takes control of your car and drives you to your destination. QNX is that rock solid!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conociendo QNX, el sistema operativo que mueve el Playbook &#124; Doculinux</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-514770</link>
		<dc:creator>Conociendo QNX, el sistema operativo que mueve el Playbook &#124; Doculinux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 07:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-514770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] como el Blackberry App World). Si alcanza con éxito estos dos objetivos es muy probable que supere los malos augurios de los analistas y mantenga (o amplíe) su cuota de [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] como el Blackberry App World). Si alcanza con éxito estos dos objetivos es muy probable que supere los malos augurios de los analistas y mantenga (o amplíe) su cuota de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-513904</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-513904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QNX solves the problem of devices pauses, as it handles inter-process communication like no other.  QNX is not linux based, but linux like, not quite something completely different, but too different to call it a fork.

Also, the Analysts are just down-right wrong.  Save extremely poor investment issues, and perhaps bad money management, Blackberry is in it for the long haul.  There is simply too many companies heavily invested in the Blackberry infrastructure.  The security on these devices is, and always has been second to none.  The fact of the matter is, if you need a secure mobile device, you need a Blackberry, because nothing else even gets close to measuring up to it in that regards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QNX solves the problem of devices pauses, as it handles inter-process communication like no other.  QNX is not linux based, but linux like, not quite something completely different, but too different to call it a fork.</p>
<p>Also, the Analysts are just down-right wrong.  Save extremely poor investment issues, and perhaps bad money management, Blackberry is in it for the long haul.  There is simply too many companies heavily invested in the Blackberry infrastructure.  The security on these devices is, and always has been second to none.  The fact of the matter is, if you need a secure mobile device, you need a Blackberry, because nothing else even gets close to measuring up to it in that regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rim</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-513045</link>
		<dc:creator>rim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-513045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QNX is on the playbook and it looks awesome!

corporations are going to be gobbling those playbook&#039;s up like hotcakes.

expect the same once it makes it&#039;s way onto the phones. perhaps on the storm 3!

buying qnx was rim&#039;s best move and it will pay dividends shortly.

the ipad looks like an overpriced toy next to the playbook ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QNX is on the playbook and it looks awesome!</p>
<p>corporations are going to be gobbling those playbook&#8217;s up like hotcakes.</p>
<p>expect the same once it makes it&#8217;s way onto the phones. perhaps on the storm 3!</p>
<p>buying qnx was rim&#8217;s best move and it will pay dividends shortly.</p>
<p>the ipad looks like an overpriced toy next to the playbook <img src='http://www.blackberrycool.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suede Pumps</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-510899</link>
		<dc:creator>Suede Pumps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-510899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll post the same information to my blog, thanks for ideas and great article.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll post the same information to my blog, thanks for ideas and great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-510399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-510399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QNX is potentially the Next Big Thing for everyone, not just RIM.

I first used QNX on embedded systems in 1984. It is too valuable to end up another footnote in history. The issues that Android is working to solve - have been solved 
in QNX for over two decades.  And I really doubt that you will see Android in a &quot;Life At Risk&quot; controller, or see Android certified as a &quot;Real-Time O/S&quot; any time soon.

Phones, Tablets, Desktops, Telecomm Systems, Entire Networks, Other Devices, and even Vehicles, that can work cooperatively to better serve an enterprise&#039;s needs.

RIM... Please Don&#039;t Screw this Up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QNX is potentially the Next Big Thing for everyone, not just RIM.</p>
<p>I first used QNX on embedded systems in 1984. It is too valuable to end up another footnote in history. The issues that Android is working to solve &#8211; have been solved<br />
in QNX for over two decades.  And I really doubt that you will see Android in a &#8220;Life At Risk&#8221; controller, or see Android certified as a &#8220;Real-Time O/S&#8221; any time soon.</p>
<p>Phones, Tablets, Desktops, Telecomm Systems, Entire Networks, Other Devices, and even Vehicles, that can work cooperatively to better serve an enterprise&#8217;s needs.</p>
<p>RIM&#8230; Please Don&#8217;t Screw this Up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clinton Roane</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-509812</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinton Roane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-509812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you fully that RIM should just take on the free Android and work from there.  Many developers know it and the tools are already there.  I was just discussing this with a developer last night who was trying to figure out if he should develop for RIM or Android.  He likes RIM devices but says everything is there already for the Android.  In all honesty I just bought and older Blackberry Curve (wish I could have gotten a newer model) but I am soooo happy with this RIM device and I would like to develop for it,  I already have Android development software on my systems.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you fully that RIM should just take on the free Android and work from there.  Many developers know it and the tools are already there.  I was just discussing this with a developer last night who was trying to figure out if he should develop for RIM or Android.  He likes RIM devices but says everything is there already for the Android.  In all honesty I just bought and older Blackberry Curve (wish I could have gotten a newer model) but I am soooo happy with this RIM device and I would like to develop for it,  I already have Android development software on my systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linux Rants &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interesting Linux News for the Day &#8211; September 12, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-509796</link>
		<dc:creator>Linux Rants &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interesting Linux News for the Day &#8211; September 12, 2010</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 06:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-509796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they Underestimate the QNX OS &#8211; Blackberry Cool (blog) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Analysts Claim RIM is Dead but they Underestimate the QNX OS &#8211; Blackberry Cool (blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-509790</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-509790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[exactly...say what you want about RIM&#039;s OS or their hardware, but these guys are not stupid when it comes to running a top notch company. they wouldn&#039;t be spending so much money if they didn&#039;t have confidence in the economics of their long-term strategy. 

i have a storm2 and love it, but of course i wish it had a 1ghz processor, more memory and a higher resolution. that being said, if they release a touchscreen phone with this type of hardware and an even more efficient and flashy os, i think they will clean up. 

more people i know use blackberries than anything else, and i bet even more would switch to blackberry if it was more technically impressive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly&#8230;say what you want about RIM&#8217;s OS or their hardware, but these guys are not stupid when it comes to running a top notch company. they wouldn&#8217;t be spending so much money if they didn&#8217;t have confidence in the economics of their long-term strategy. </p>
<p>i have a storm2 and love it, but of course i wish it had a 1ghz processor, more memory and a higher resolution. that being said, if they release a touchscreen phone with this type of hardware and an even more efficient and flashy os, i think they will clean up. </p>
<p>more people i know use blackberries than anything else, and i bet even more would switch to blackberry if it was more technically impressive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Mixon</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-509785</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Mixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-509785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QNX could be RIM&#039;s Death Star--a completely useless weapon against a fast-moving, highly adaptive enemy that ultimately gets blown to bits because of an apparent ridiculously huge design flaw.

I like BlackBerry devices, and I can appreciate that RIM is a precarious position. Their existing OS is essentially dead; its codebase is just too old and not up to snuff with the demand of today&#039;s mobile users. Their business model has also been obsoleted. Today, Google can pump tons of resources into the Android OS while HTC can do the same with the hardware. The result is two experts meeting in the middle to make one killer phone. RIM has to do both by themselves, and neither one is easy. Sure, Apple has pulled it off to an extent, but their real success is in their marketing, not their product. Just look at the lack of multi-tasking and Antennagate to see that.

But recreating the BlackBerry OS on QNX is a huge gamble. Who cares if QNX consumes x% less memory than linux-based Android? Tens or hundreds of thousands of developers know linux. How many know QNX? RIM already suffers from trying to entice developers to write apps for their platform. Changing it completely is definitely not going to make that any easier. In the end, users are going to care about what they can DO with the OS, not that is has a POSIX-based tool-chain. On the other hand, RIM just doesn&#039;t have that many options. They have to try something.

I really think RIM should consider taking Google&#039;s free Android OS and then building the BlackBerry specific functionality on top of it, much like HTC or Samsung do with Sense or TouchWiz, respectively, but to a much further extent. They get the best of both worlds--an in-place, highly extensible mobile OS with tons of developers, tools, and other resources already in place and they get the BlackBerry security and usability we are all expect from a BlackBerry. Not to mention they might then be able to focus more on continuing to make great devices, and not having to play eternal catching up the software side. One can dream at least...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QNX could be RIM&#8217;s Death Star&#8211;a completely useless weapon against a fast-moving, highly adaptive enemy that ultimately gets blown to bits because of an apparent ridiculously huge design flaw.</p>
<p>I like BlackBerry devices, and I can appreciate that RIM is a precarious position. Their existing OS is essentially dead; its codebase is just too old and not up to snuff with the demand of today&#8217;s mobile users. Their business model has also been obsoleted. Today, Google can pump tons of resources into the Android OS while HTC can do the same with the hardware. The result is two experts meeting in the middle to make one killer phone. RIM has to do both by themselves, and neither one is easy. Sure, Apple has pulled it off to an extent, but their real success is in their marketing, not their product. Just look at the lack of multi-tasking and Antennagate to see that.</p>
<p>But recreating the BlackBerry OS on QNX is a huge gamble. Who cares if QNX consumes x% less memory than linux-based Android? Tens or hundreds of thousands of developers know linux. How many know QNX? RIM already suffers from trying to entice developers to write apps for their platform. Changing it completely is definitely not going to make that any easier. In the end, users are going to care about what they can DO with the OS, not that is has a POSIX-based tool-chain. On the other hand, RIM just doesn&#8217;t have that many options. They have to try something.</p>
<p>I really think RIM should consider taking Google&#8217;s free Android OS and then building the BlackBerry specific functionality on top of it, much like HTC or Samsung do with Sense or TouchWiz, respectively, but to a much further extent. They get the best of both worlds&#8211;an in-place, highly extensible mobile OS with tons of developers, tools, and other resources already in place and they get the BlackBerry security and usability we are all expect from a BlackBerry. Not to mention they might then be able to focus more on continuing to make great devices, and not having to play eternal catching up the software side. One can dream at least&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincentclement1</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-509783</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincentclement1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-509783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t quite understand how RIM is losing ground in the consumer market. Anytime I see &#039;sales statistics&#039;, RIM is increasing market share. I keep hearing that the enterprise market is stale right now due to the poor economy. The only place RIM can be increasing market share is in the consumer market. I know of at least 8 people who have purchased a BlackBerry in the past few months. I don&#039;t know of anyone who has purchased an iPhone or Android-based smartphone.

Let&#039;s ignore the analysts. Their only purpose is to manipulate stock prices through poorly-worded press releases. If these guys really knew how companies worked, they would be owning and operating their own company.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t quite understand how RIM is losing ground in the consumer market. Anytime I see &#8216;sales statistics&#8217;, RIM is increasing market share. I keep hearing that the enterprise market is stale right now due to the poor economy. The only place RIM can be increasing market share is in the consumer market. I know of at least 8 people who have purchased a BlackBerry in the past few months. I don&#8217;t know of anyone who has purchased an iPhone or Android-based smartphone.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s ignore the analysts. Their only purpose is to manipulate stock prices through poorly-worded press releases. If these guys really knew how companies worked, they would be owning and operating their own company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Respighifan</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-509768</link>
		<dc:creator>Respighifan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-509768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yawn - an Android fanboy lurks again.........]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn &#8211; an Android fanboy lurks again&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle McInnes</title>
		<link>http://www.blackberrycool.com/2010/09/10/analysts-claim-rim-is-dead-but-they-underestimate-the-qnx-os/comment-page-1/#comment-509757</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle McInnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackberrycool.com/?p=22194#comment-509757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comment, Alec. RIM going the way of Palm just seems like a conversation trend right now. It&#039;s like how many think Microsoft will by RIM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Alec. RIM going the way of Palm just seems like a conversation trend right now. It&#8217;s like how many think Microsoft will by RIM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
